Linux

Sort:
Avatar of SteveM

I'm a Linux user (MEPIS 6.5), and was just curious how many of you chess players out there were also fellow Linux fans, and what 'flavor' you use.

Let me know! 


Avatar of Charlie91
Count me in.  I have 3 working Linuxes--Ubuntu 7.10, Xubuntu 7.10 and Debian GNU/Linux 4.0.  I'm using the latter 2 for my older computer, and the 1st for the newer one.  Cool
Avatar of rootworm
pft. Slackware for life losers. =P
Avatar of gmatt
ubuntu, I used to play with the linux kernel lots with gentoo, but gentoo started to fall apart. used to compile all my binaries from src too hehe =) firefox and open office took 1-2hrs to compile, each!
Avatar of gmatt
gnu chess is one of the toughest chess engines i have ever played, and its completely open src!
Avatar of Charlie91
rootworm, you don't seem enthusiastic...  It's good to have a choice in Linux--use the binaries, or compile your own binaries from source.  Wink
Avatar of lubo

I'm using Ubuntu 7.10.

I run ChessBase products under Wine. It's OK. I don't miss anything from windows apps. 

 

Plus I don't miss antivirus programs, anti worm programs... and ipTables works perfect for me!  


Avatar of JJJJS

Ubuntu 7.10 with Vista as a dualboot.

 The only thing I've missed is the ability to have a library in Windows Media Player.


Avatar of lubo
JJJJS wrote:

Ubuntu 7.10 with Vista as a dualboot.

 The only thing I've missed is the ability to have a library in Windows Media Player.


 Hi JJJJS!

Try AmaroK .. it's way better than Windows Media Player.


Avatar of SteveM

Yes...AmoroK is my main music choice...it also has live radio feeds! 

 


Avatar of SteveM
Charlie91 wrote: Count me in.  I have 3 working Linuxes--Ubuntu 7.10, Xubuntu 7.10 and Debian GNU/Linux 4.0.  I'm using the latter 2 for my older computer, and the 1st for the newer one. 

 ...and I'm using Ubuntu 7.10 for an older computer-

excellent choice! 


Avatar of janus255
I used to run Redhat and Debian on my home computer. These days I just use xp: it's more insulting to my intelligence, and more virus-prone, but it's less of a pain in the ass. I still use Fedora Core at my work. I've also used Suse and Knoppix.
Avatar of Sharukin
I have used various Linuxes (Suse, Red Hat, Yellow Dog, Mandrake and so on) on PCs and Macs. Now I just stick to OS X because it is Unix based and works without me having to think too hard.
Avatar of JJJJS
Thanks for that, I'll definitely check AmaroK out. At the moment I'm just using VLC and loading an album or a video at a time.
Avatar of Alex_M
I use Fedora Core at home.
Avatar of igor
Sharukin wrote: I have used various Linuxes (Suse, Red Hat, Yellow Dog, Mandrake and so on) on PCs and Macs. Now I just stick to OS X because it is Unix based and works without me having to think too hard.

 to be more exact, OS X is based on FreeBSD. and that is what www.chess.com is running on.


Avatar of alma_eterna
I use Suse Linux.
Avatar of Charlie91
igor wrote: Sharukin wrote: I have used various Linuxes (Suse, Red Hat, Yellow Dog, Mandrake and so on) on PCs and Macs. Now I just stick to OS X because it is Unix based and works without me having to think too hard.

 to be more exact, OS X is based on FreeBSD. and that is what www.chess.com is running on.


 Correct me if I'm wrong, if the OS is a big family tree, are all the OSes today descendants of UNIX?  Even Windows descends from UNIX?  OS X, BSD and Linux are more closely related, while Windows became a distant relative...  What makes a UNIX?  Foot in mouth  [Maybe this should be a separate topic.]


Avatar of Sharukin
Charlie91 wrote: igor wrote: Sharukin wrote: I have used various Linuxes (Suse, Red Hat, Yellow Dog, Mandrake and so on) on PCs and Macs. Now I just stick to OS X because it is Unix based and works without me having to think too hard.

 to be more exact, OS X is based on FreeBSD. and that is what www.chess.com is running on.


 Correct me if I'm wrong, if the OS is a big family tree, are all the OSes today descendants of UNIX?  Even Windows descends from UNIX?  OS X, BSD and Linux are more closely related, while Windows became a distant relative...  What makes a UNIX?    [Maybe this should be a separate topic.]


 I think what makes a Unixalike OS is whether you can compile stuff written on one to run on another. As an example, I can pick up some code written on any flavour of Unix, BSD, Linux etc and generally get it to compile and run on my Mac. Doing the same with Windows in my experience (as recently as last year) is not necessarily so easy and stuff written specifically for Windows generally requires too much effort to get running.


Avatar of Charlie91
That makes sense.  Yes, there is much effort of making Windows 'UNIX-like', but lesser effort of making Linux 'Windows-like' using Wine as mentioned by lubo.  In terms of appearance, KDE looks like Windows, and I guess Windows tries to look like Mac...
Avatar of Guest6252799716
Please Sign Up to comment.

If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.