NOVAK DJOKOVIC

Sort:
Avatar of EscherehcsE

Ah, Jan 17, so only a few more days. :-)

Avatar of Woollensock2
They’ve revoked his visa for the second time, it’s time for the government to stick to the entry rules, and put this guy on a plane home .
Avatar of Woollensock2
I can’t understand why the government are farting around with this dude ! …….unvaccinated are not welcome , those are the rules so get rid of him pronto ! 😤
Avatar of Thefoxak47

im unvacc

Avatar of dfgh123

Why is everyone double posting.

Avatar of playerafar

Is Australia to be about a tennis tournament or to be about Australia's many millions of citizens and their fight against Covid ?
Suggestion:  the Australians have their heads on straight ...
and the tennis tournament will be low priority.
But there's no crystal ball ?
Idea:  If the tournament starts Monday without Djokovic - and proceeds to the second round - could Djokovic get a 'bye' and start in Round 2 ?
I don't see him getting two 'byes'.
If Round 3 starts 6 days from now with Round 2 complete and he's still not in ...
then its not 'bye'.  Its 'good-bye'.


Regarding terminology:
'anti-vaxx' could mean two different things ...
it could mean refusing to be vaccinated -
or trying to interfere with others getting vaccinated - a very different thing.
Some 'anti-vaxxers' may try to maintain that its about a personal 'right' to not be vaccinated ...  which could be somewhat phony ...
because citizens of almost all countries have that right and that right is already protected.
Indonesia and the Vatican (Holy See) require vaccination for all citizens last time I checked (unless you have an exemption)
but in most countries - its not compulsory.  You might need it for various jobs or to enter various places - but that doesn't have to mean its 'forced'.
Often - these discussions degenerate into semantics battles -
and its like we're here to serve the words and the dictionary instead of them serving us.
Don't let it !  'Forced' will mean whatever according to who decides to see it whatever way.

Avatar of playerafar

In discussions of sensitive subjects -
anybody can try very hard to make the discussion about those who post - instead of considering what is being said.
The actual issues.  Whoever - wants it to be about who is posting.
Takes various forms.  'You and me'.  Ping pong.  Personal attacks.
Happens all the time.
The usual advice is 'don't feed it by responding'.
But there's another side to it -
others can post around whoever's doing this - with a particular idea in mind:
Because somebody has made a pingpong post or posts of some kind - then somebody else can post before and after 
without making 'two or more consecutive' posts !!
happy.pnghappy.png
My opinion:  Two consecutive isn't 'nasty'. 
It starts getting nasty at three in a row.  Or 'column' rather.
(but sometimes nobody posts for a long time)

But 'one in a row' is nice.  happy.png

Avatar of ATV-STEVE

The player admitted to submitting an incorrect declaration on entry to Oz

game,set and match.

Avatar of blueemu
Jozsund wrote:

im unvacc

Don't go to Australia.

Avatar of playerafar

'Nationalism' - supporting their national hero ... versus 'fighting Covid Pandemic - which has now killed over five million people ...
The Serbian president probably very much understands the moral logic ...
but maybe he thinks he has no choice.
Politically.  How does he go against the Serbian national hero ?
This kind of thing happens in politics constantly.

There's now an intense suspense as to whether Djokovic will be allowed to play Monday in the first round of the Australian Open.
So next thing: if he's confined back into a quarantine hotel - that means no practicing for the match ...

One could 'worry' about this !  Concern about sports results of other people.  Lol happy.png
Is is a little bit like tabloids and actor/celebrity gossip?

Only a little.  Worldwide pandemic  - hardly celebrity gossip. 

Avatar of playerafar

Legal court on Sunday - tennis court on Monday ?
Dkjokovic has a big chance to get through on technicalities.
I can almost see it now - judges and politicians forced to watch an awful process unfold and powerless to do anything about it.
Technical details as to whether Djokovic knew something at certain times or was he honest or the correct box on a form was not checked or was it okay for him to be in Spain beforehand ...
all juxtaposed against a worldwide pandemic and a country fighting it and millions dead.
The notion that any of the technical details should matter ...
lawyers making money off it ...

Avatar of AussieMatey

Australia has had 3 years of lockdowns - more than any other country - but not that many deaths. Over 90% of Aussies are vaccinated. We don't want a selfish Djokovic coming in and spreading anything, because he's proved that he doesn't isolate.

I do see Djokovic getting 2 byes - Bye Bye. happy.png

Avatar of AussieMatey

After Djokovic is booted out and gets a 3 year ban, he can come back, if vaccinated, and contest the 2025 Australian Open, although he'll have to go through Qualifying, because he'll be ranked about 580 in the world by then. happy.png

Avatar of playerafar
AussieRookie wrote:

Australia has had 3 years of lockdowns - more than any other country - but not that many deaths. Over 90% of Aussies are vaccinated. We don't want a selfish Djokovic coming in and spreading anything, because he's proved that he doesn't isolate.

I do see Djokovic getting 2 byes - Bye Bye.

Well said !
And its good to see somebody speaking up for Australia and Australians !!
And from that country too !  

Djokovic could still redeem himself by just offering to leave the country now - on his own initiative ... but that seems so unlikely now. 
That he would do that.
It would be the one thing - the basic way to show he can choose the greater choice.
But maybe not even one single person close to him even hints at the idea.

Avatar of TheHarbingerOfDoom
You can’t blame Novak really. The feller is clearly completely barmy. Instead of deporting him they should probably stick him in a nice padded cell. For his own well being and safety of course!
Avatar of Woollensock2
And the safety of others of course !
Avatar of TheHarbingerOfDoom
Does anybody really believe he has COVID in December?

It’s funny how he managed to get it just at the right time to stop him being able to be vaccinated. Bearing in mind he would not of being able to be fully vaccinated even if he had the first jab in December. Fellers had a friendly doctor mock up a fake test for him to say he’s had COVID. Why there is even a court case to decide if he can say is a ridiculous idea. Feller is completely nuts.
Avatar of dfgh123

I believe he had covid proabably the mild one which I had, but he shouldn't have been walking around doing meet and greets with the press when positive, pretty irresponsible.

Avatar of TheHarbingerOfDoom
He hasn’t had it at all. He’s made it up because it conveniently gives him the only way he could travel to Australia. He doesn’t know how to be honest and thinks he can do what he wants because he’s rich and famous.

Not exactly a role model for kids….or anyone else for that matter.
Avatar of Woollensock2
I’m pretty sure Djokovic will soon be on the plane ✈️ back home , where he belongs