Has Light got a decay factor?

https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/

Voyager travelling for 40 years at 10 miles a second has only travelled 19 light hours. The nearest star being 4.5 light years away!

The telescope distant observation should be verified by Voyager on location observation. We will know the distant light behavior.

A photon (particle of light) selects from an infinity of paths inside the quantum wave to a dead certainty the path of least action (stationary action)

@fieldsofforce. That is  one side of some views regarding light. And another view is light got a twist as @Iknowthemoves have proposed.

That might relate to a twisted universe structure. Curious if you can find the twisting effect in a stationary photon. 

                                                        _______________________________________

I acknowledge a spin.  a confirmed physical fact in our universe.  I do not acknowledge an invented twist for which there is no indication of even the hint of a physical phenomenon.

I have a question.  How long does it take a photon at 186,000 miles per second to find amongst an infinity of paths the  path of least action?

Who knows if the particles  in matter and antimatter have the same spin?

So many galaxies discovered over the last decade that the Big Bang Theory just can't explain.

Here is just one of many https://io9.gizmodo.com/5927315/hubble-has-spotted-an-ancient-galaxy-that-shouldnt-exist

Richard Feynman formulated the math  for  the  technology built in to the  photon.  Inside the  quantum wave the  photon searches  an infinity of  paths to seek out and find the path of  least  action (stationary  action).  

It is  because the photon is designed to search an infinity of paths  that it is impossible for light to have a decay  factor.

Beacause 

There are pros and cons regarding the light's decay factor. If we remember in the past previous post that someone said of decaying light will take a tremendous amount of time to be observed.

 The photon has to be an enternal particle in order to search an infinity of paths to find the path of least action.  Infinity is the key

But this universe might be finite. And the type of particles might be finite too.

                                                                            ____________________

Grigori Perelman 4 years ago published, on the internet, the proof of the Poincare Conjecture.  Perelman declared that without Ricci Flow he would not have been able to deduce the proof and concommmitantly the proof for Thurston's Geometric Conjecture.  This is the field of mathematics that deals with the shape of the universe.  The peer review of Perelman's proof makes it clear that it is impossible to determine the shape of the universe.  It is impossible because infinity has no bounds.

I have no idea if i could prove the hypothetical solution for ANLC (it is involving infinity). As far as for now this hypothesis was derived from abstraction.

Regarding the light you could see it differently behaving inside universe and outside universe.

                                                                       ___________________

I provide a specific example of real factual proof aand you respond with vague references.  ANLC is n acronym for what.  PLEASE be specific.

ANLC :  Advanced Newton Laws Curve. See post #4414.

ANLC (Advanced Newton Laws Curve) Speculation that you are combining with cosmic consciousness.  All bunk.  RELATIVITY is transcendental meditation.  The universe talking to itself.  The mass of energy tells space/time how to warp.  And space/time tells energy and its mass how to...

Now let us get back to Grigori Perelman and his proof for Thurston's Geometric Conjecture. 

I think ANLC is rise from the logic consequency of the equivalency between the momentum and instantaneous gravity force. This reason is one thing. Finding the equivalency is the other thing.

Unless you think the equivalency is a fantasy then it is logically true. Only we have a problem with finding proof of the equivalency.

I am not sure if Special Relativity is proven experimentally. But congratulation if that is proven. Perhaps we need Special relativity.

It seems being derived from observation. The interesting part is that speed was ultimate for every observer. It means each observer is forming a local system by which being paired with other observer (other local system). And the smallest local system is as small as photon size.

It is just unbelievable if this is true.

What was the basis for Lorentz transform. Well, i hope it doesnt' have to do with the absence of light in the measurement place.