Has Light got a decay factor?

Sort:
Avatar of fieldsofforce
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of Metar_Taf

We still have to argue? Oh my, I will start spamming soon, this forum has no worth.

Avatar of fieldsofforce
HolographWars wrote:

We still have to argue? Oh my, I will start spamming soon, this forum has no worth.

                                                                       __________________________

Instead posting vague generalized statements like:  We still have to argue? 

Post some detail that you consider to be facts.  For example what do you know about Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown?

Avatar of Fifthelement
fieldsofforce wrote:
Iknowthemoves wrote:

I'm content that all radiation leaving a gravity well will be 'spagettified' ie stretched ,elongated or in lights case, Red Shifted. Can that process be described as 'decay' ?

                                                                               ______________________

Once again spontaneous symmetry breakdown only works on subatomic particles that have mass.  The photon has no mass because of the insulating mechanism described above.  The magnetic wave of electromagnetic energy contains electrons that have mass.

Does electron mixed in photon ?

Avatar of Metar_Taf

This is like a linear equation:

1. All Solutions: That is clearly not the case here.

2. One Solution: We still don't know the answer. And a hypothetical question like this will not be answered unless proven by science any time soon.

3. All Solutions: This is a yes or no question, after all???.

And THAT'S IT.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

"Positive Electrons" oh boy xD

Avatar of fieldsofforce

The magnetic wave of electromagnetic energy contains electrons that have mass.

                                                     ____________________

This post statement is wrong

Avatar of fieldsofforce
HolographWars wrote:

"Positive Electrons" oh boy xD

                                                                              __________________

positive electrons?   where did you get that from anything posted here.

Besides if you know even basic physics you know that positive electrons are also known as positrons (antimatter electrons that are positively charged.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

"basic physics" We aren't talking about that!!! Of course only protons are positive and electrons are negative. What a joke. Oh boy xxxxxDDDDD

Avatar of Metar_Taf

And yes, that post statement is wrong, probably a mistype.

Avatar of fieldsofforce
HolographWars wrote:

"basic physics" We aren't talking about that!!! Of course only protons are positive and electrons are negative. What a joke. Oh boy xxxxxDDDDD

                                                                                         _________________________

Address yourself to spontaneous symmetry breakdown.  NOT pot shotting without saying anaything.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

The physics course never covered any of this "basic" stuff, though I am lucky enough to know something. SSB is basic for you, since you probably learned it in AP physics.

Avatar of fieldsofforce
HolographWars wrote:

The physics course never covered any of this "basic" stuff, though I am lucky enough to know something. SSB is basic for you, since you probably learned it in AP physics.

                                                                    __________________________

You keep skirting the issues.   I want to know what specific facts you about spontaneous symmetry breakdown.  This is a process in the universe that has left us with 5% Baryonic matter.  The discoverers of this process have been awarded 3 Nobel Prizes. 

Stop the bs

Avatar of Metar_Taf

In explicit symmetry breaking, if we consider two outcomes, the probability of a pair of outcomes can be different. By definition, spontaneous symmetry breaking requires the existence of a symmetric probability distribution—any pair of outcomes has the same probability. In other words, the underlying laws are invariant under a symmetry transformation.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

Wait a minute. Who are we arguing against?

Avatar of fieldsofforce
HolographWars wrote:

In explicit symmetry breaking, if we consider two outcomes, the probability of a pair of outcomes can be different. By definition, spontaneous symmetry breaking requires the existence of a symmetric probability distribution—any pair of outcomes has the same probability. In other words, the underlying laws are invariant under a symmetry transformation.

                                                                        ___________________

Now I am convinced you are nothing but a major bullshitter.  Shut the fuck up.

You get no more responses from me.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

Huh?

I answered your question

Avatar of Metar_Taf

This is enough. The argument is over. Time to spam.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

This is enough. The argument is over. Time to spam.

Avatar of Metar_Taf

This is enough. The argument is over. Time to spam.