Has Light got a decay factor?
We still have to argue? Oh my, I will start spamming soon, this forum has no worth.
__________________________
Instead posting vague generalized statements like: We still have to argue?
Post some detail that you consider to be facts. For example what do you know about Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown?
I'm content that all radiation leaving a gravity well will be 'spagettified' ie stretched ,elongated or in lights case, Red Shifted. Can that process be described as 'decay' ?
______________________
Once again spontaneous symmetry breakdown only works on subatomic particles that have mass. The photon has no mass because of the insulating mechanism described above. The magnetic wave of electromagnetic energy contains electrons that have mass.
Does electron mixed in photon ?
This is like a linear equation:
1. All Solutions: That is clearly not the case here.
2. One Solution: We still don't know the answer. And a hypothetical question like this will not be answered unless proven by science any time soon.
3. All Solutions: This is a yes or no question, after all???.
And THAT'S IT.
The magnetic wave of electromagnetic energy contains electrons that have mass.
____________________
This post statement is wrong
"Positive Electrons" oh boy xD
__________________
positive electrons? where did you get that from anything posted here.
Besides if you know even basic physics you know that positive electrons are also known as positrons (antimatter electrons that are positively charged.
"basic physics" We aren't talking about that!!! Of course only protons are positive and electrons are negative. What a joke. Oh boy xxxxxDDDDD
"basic physics" We aren't talking about that!!! Of course only protons are positive and electrons are negative. What a joke. Oh boy xxxxxDDDDD
_________________________
Address yourself to spontaneous symmetry breakdown. NOT pot shotting without saying anaything.
The physics course never covered any of this "basic" stuff, though I am lucky enough to know something. SSB is basic for you, since you probably learned it in AP physics.
The physics course never covered any of this "basic" stuff, though I am lucky enough to know something. SSB is basic for you, since you probably learned it in AP physics.
__________________________
You keep skirting the issues. I want to know what specific facts you about spontaneous symmetry breakdown. This is a process in the universe that has left us with 5% Baryonic matter. The discoverers of this process have been awarded 3 Nobel Prizes.
Stop the bs
In explicit symmetry breaking, if we consider two outcomes, the probability of a pair of outcomes can be different. By definition, spontaneous symmetry breaking requires the existence of a symmetric probability distribution—any pair of outcomes has the same probability. In other words, the underlying laws are invariant under a symmetry transformation.
In explicit symmetry breaking, if we consider two outcomes, the probability of a pair of outcomes can be different. By definition, spontaneous symmetry breaking requires the existence of a symmetric probability distribution—any pair of outcomes has the same probability. In other words, the underlying laws are invariant under a symmetry transformation.
___________________
Now I am convinced you are nothing but a major bullshitter. Shut the fuck up.
You get no more responses from me.