Three chess geeks walk into a bar. Only one's nose is broken.

Sort:
Avatar of Boyd-Boyette

guys, ye are thick, THICK!

Avatar of Endapuppy
I is srupid
Avatar of herdwars

The first statement is easy and proven allready. It doesn t require the existence of supremes, but if there is a supreme irs unique.

The existence of supreme is tough, though if there is only a finite number of beings then its clear.

Avatar of Endapuppy
I guess ir's a tough question when all is said and done. Perhaps the answer is out there
Avatar of Endapuppy
I think I've killed the question
Avatar of herdwars

The answer is 42....

Avatar of Endapuppy
The answer is still to come
Avatar of herdwars

That s a good question.

Avatar of Endapuppy
There are more questions than answers
Avatar of KantWasWrong

Supreme being is defined as necessary existence. Supreme -> Necessary. Being -> Existence. You would know this had you consulted Stanford.

I now have a question. Why are good and decent people whom I respect destroying my thread? Do you masturbate as you mock me?

You're acting like the Three Stooges in Windsor Castle.

I just wanted a quiet little thread of serious philosophical discussion. If it is not to be, then have at it.

Avatar of herdwars

So you removed your original questions. That s a pitty. Supreme being is necessary existence..... hmmm

Now I can t see anylonger why that should be unique. In fact all questions are now too difficult for me.

Avatar of Endapuppy
Thank you thank you, it seems I was correct yet again. Any more difficult questions?
Avatar of KantWasWrong

No. No more.

Avatar of Endapuppy
Feel free to plagiarise my amazing answer for your essay. Maybe even forward it to Mr Dennet? It may help change his opinion on this topic.
Avatar of Boyd-Boyette

aha, the OP has run from the topic with his head between his knees.

Avatar of president_max
KantWasWrong wrote:

*Snip* Do you masturbate as you mock me? *Snip*

You must have mistaken us for butcher_bill ...

Avatar of Boyd-Boyette

he thought he was being mocked ? never saw that one coming.

Avatar of Nilocra_the_White

Mathematically  speaking: Is there a supreme number, ie one that is greater than all the others. We say the sum of all the integers is infinity and is large indeed but infinity plus one is the same number. There are infinitely many numbers between zero and positive one but there is no largest number between zero and positive one. It is definitely possible that there is some infinitely supreme being and that being might grow and become even more supreme or maybe that being could have offspring that grow to surpass the parent. Non countable infinities considered to be "larger" infinities than countable infinities yet we cannot get to the end of either and establish a single supreme number. Perhaps in some things there is no supreme one or supreme two or supreme three or..... For Endapuppy please measure the "biggest" of the following : color, love, hate, compassion,.. which are not size but certainly characteristics a being might have.

Avatar of herdwars

Oh no infin+1 is definitely diferent from infin. in fact you can keep counting infin+2 , infin+3, ....

Till you arive at infin + infin = 2infin and again keep on counting and arrive at 3infin, 4infin , ....

Then get to infin×infin = infin^2 and again keep counting and reach infin^infin, and again keep counting.... till infin^infin^infin,  and again keep counting....... etc...etc.... etc,....

Avatar of Endapuppy
Compassion