Hah thanks Fiddle! 😂
The moderators allow the left to discuss politics but not the right
Sort:
This dude's nutty and clearly an egomaniac.
I'm totally baffled that stumpy had not locked this thread on the first page of his shafting towards stumpy, just amazing this thread's still unlocked.
Yeah I agree Fiddle.
The nut told stumpy to shut up.... that right there is wtf crazy, his #20 post
SoupSailor72 wrote:
Taseredbird is back. How long will he last? I’m gonna go with 2 days. What do y’all think?
Your time of abuse, collusion and coordinated censorship is over. Good riddance. You have been reported. Give me 6 months and I'll probably last longer, it's plenty of time to wipe you corrupt freemasons off the site.
6 months? Let’s be real. I’m sticking with my estimation of 2 days. Any other bets?
Taseredbird is back. How long will he last? I’m gonna go with 2 days. What do y’all think?
Your time of abuse, collusion and coordinated censorship is over. Good riddance. You have been reported. Give me 6 months and I'll probably last longer, it's plenty of time to wipe you corrupt freemasons off the site.
6 months? Let’s be real. I’m sticking with my estimation of 2 days. Any other bets?
😂 2 hrs?
Mmmm. I've already reported him.
Maybe 4-5 hours
🤣
MeowmersWem wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
MeowmersWem wrote:
If you believe that the mods are biased against you, show some proof and evidence. Not every person is perfect, so some threads have been kept open for longer, however the mods are there to keep the forums civil and peaceful, giving them no motive for bias. All politics threads are shut down by the mods regardless of the stance. If you think that everybody on chess.com is "woke" and "leftist", then it is probably you're stance which is faulty. Even if you think you are correct, don't spread hate and insults if they are not firing back at you. No slander intended, but I disagree with your opinion. Big words don't change my stance if there is no evidence or meaning behind them.
There have been multiple extremely vocal and aggressive left wing people who attack others for not having the same opinions about equality and border control, so I know for a fact that you are lying about the evidence, just like a typical politician and freemason. I've had more than enough reason to fire back at you, so don't complain about the contempt and hatred that you receive when you act in an abusive manner. You are coming up with finger pointing tactics and contradictory statements because you cannot prove your erroneous view.
Straying away from the main topic doesn't help your case. I am trying to say that no large-scale evidence about moderators being biased has been shown by you. No words about the outside world. If you made the first move by vocalizing your concerns about the mods, then it should be backed up by proof. This is in no way trying to silence you by any means, however I have the opinion that you have not shown an argument which actually helps your statement. Most of these concerns have been backed up before, which makes me question if you actually read the rebuttals.
You are now dismissing the relevance of my evidence by pretending it's off topic. The whole topic of this conversation was about the leftists involvement in censorship so you obviously haven't been paying attention otherwise you would have understood the relevance of what I have said in relation to the conversation. The outside world has nothing to do with the terrible problems I have witnessed here so don't involve them in it, therefore it is best that you don't go around talking about the outside world in relation to the specific problems I see on this site. You haven't addressed what I have said at all, your attempts at deflection are not good enough and I expect proper answers so you had better fulfill such expectations, I can't wait to see the left getting censored for once and for all and watch them getting their just desserts.
MeowmersWem wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
MeowmersWem wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
TheWolfMaster37 wrote:
Eh I just don’t see any proof of your accusation. And as an avid clue player I have learned the importance of that
See, you are a terrible clue player, you make accusations and then bail when you get called out on it. You cannot be a very good detective when you base everyone on circumstantial evidence that flies in the face of logic.
No shots were fired. @TheWolfMaster37 has their opinion and thinks that there was no evidence. 1st Amendment. Speaking of evidence, I see none in your case. Not even any circumstantial evidence, which you seem so critical of. No slander intended to you, but I find fault in your case.
Denial, blatant lying and ignorance will not help to maintain your position so don't try glossing over the facts. If you weren't there to witness what went on you shouldn't be allowed to speak about it.
Again, if there are facts, show them. This is an open invitation. Until then, stop trying to dodge the question. This is not supposed to be a political debate, just a response to your statement.
You are making this about politics by taking sides and helping censorship. I have answered every question thrown at me.
saygrrmanytimes wrote:
Mmmm. Ad hominem. To prove that I did not know logic you completely ignored my argument and attacked me again. How did you shoot my argument down? You didn't. You attacked me again.
This is a typical example of one of your strawman arguments and a perfect non-sequitar. Calling something out for being illogical and a non-sequitar isn't an ad hominem, it is a rebuttal. You talk about being attacked whenever you get refuted so you are obviously coming out with excuses, are hypersensitive and are playing the victim. The topic of this discussion is about your behaviour, so let's stick to the point.
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:
saygrrmanytimes wrote:
@taseredbirdinstinct, you don't have any actual proof behind your claim of me not knowing what a logical fallacy is. This leads me to believe YOU are the one who doesn't know what a logical fallacy is. Let me tell you the name of one of the fallacies you used while saying that I didn't know what fallacies are: 'ad hominem'. This means: 'to the man'. Which is when someone attacks the person making the argument instead of the argument.
😂 you tell'm, girl!
Girl? I'm a grown man.
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:
This dude's nutty and clearly an egomaniac.
I'm totally baffled that stumpy had not locked this thread on the first page of his shafting towards stumpy, just amazing this thread's still unlocked.
Calling me an egomaniac and nutty are ad hominems you hypocrite. I see you get all upset and hurt like a little girl because your idol stumpy got challenged, I see you are trying to change the subject to be about stumpy, stop bringing stumpy into this, you obviously cannot stick to one point.
May 6, 2023
0
#76
Guys please calm yourselves ! …..come and join Woolly in a nice cup of coffee and a doughnut 🍩 ✌️😹
ahh_fiddlefaddle wrote:
The nut told stumpy to shut up.... that right there is wtf crazy, his #20 post
This is my thread so I'll decide who shuts up, be quiet and shut up, I've already told you to shut up once, this is my thread so this an act of insanity on your part to even think about challenging me.
SoupSailor72 wrote:
SoupSailor72 wrote:
Taseredbird is back. How long will he last? I’m gonna go with 2 days. What do y’all think?
Your time of abuse, collusion and coordinated censorship is over. Good riddance. You have been reported. Give me 6 months and I'll probably last longer, it's plenty of time to wipe you corrupt freemasons off the site.
6 months? Let’s be real. I’m sticking with my estimation of 2 days. Any other bets?
Taseredbird is back. How long will he last? I’m gonna go with 2 days. What do y’all think?
Your time of abuse, collusion and coordinated censorship is over. Good riddance. You have been reported. Give me 6 months and I'll probably last longer, it's plenty of time to wipe you corrupt freemasons off the site.
6 months? Let’s be real. I’m sticking with my estimation of 2 days. Any other bets?
Your desire to wish evil and censorship on others will cause your complaints to be ignored, you are dismissed and held in contempt, now get out of here. Ganging up on me in order to get me censored makes you a coward, you like to trick yourself into thinking you are being clever by coming up with this nonsense, you are trying to get the moderators to turn on me by banding together like a bunch of idiotic, dumb pack animals yet you still wonder why nobody listens to you or takes your seriously, shut up you fools of bad character, trying to get someone censored is the hallmark of an ignorant fool, not an intelligent person.
Woollensck3 wrote:
Guys please calm yourselves ! …..come and join Woolly in a nice cup of coffee and a doughnut 🍩 ✌️😹
I agree, they better had calm down and not get themselves worked up and excited or they'll be in big trouble.
@taseredbirdinstinct, you don't have any actual proof behind your claim of me not knowing what a logical fallacy is. This leads me to believe YOU are the one who doesn't know what a logical fallacy is. Let me tell you the name of one of the fallacies you used while saying that I didn't know what fallacies are: 'ad hominem'. This means: 'to the man'. Which is when someone attacks the person making the argument instead of the argument.
😂 you tell'm, girl!