we have a problem

RICH THINKS THAT HE SHOULD BE AWARDED FOR THE MOST ACTIVE PLAYER TROPHY, AND I THINK I HAVE A BETTER CHANCE THAN HIM. WHO DO YOU THINK IT SHOULD BE? PLEASE VOTE.

yes but look at my forum "vote for....." you'll see the answer.

okay so... me or rich

you can also vote me for the trophy.

thats true

but when im on i stay on for at least 2 hours.

and look at one of my forums titled dont you hate how...

thanks

you rock

If you want to be voted for give me some examples of your most informative, educational, witty posts to judge..

im just saying that im active, but you can look at don't you hate how...

"but you can look at don't you hate how"

Can you try to re-phrase that bit? I didn't understand it at all.

my forum post is called dont you hate how...

OK. To be honest I don't see how a simple observation about chess players being stereotyped as "nerds" is good enough to recieve an award. Is there some sort of site trophy called "Most Active player" that you want? Because anyone can just post endless topics without any particular substance, there shouldn't be an award for it.

ok.

How do I get to vote for site trophies anyway?

you go to fun, then there will be a tropies thing click on that

OK, I voted for Grakovsky, not for being the most "active", which is meaningless in itself if the content is worthless. But for the wide diversity of his topics.

ok

Awww.. Sorry, but why should loads of random stuff like pictures of Homisidal cats be worthy of prestige over someone who posts interesting topics such as Einstein and Chess? And lots of them as well.