As far as I can tell, the Marine/atheist professor story is an urban legend. See here: http://www.snopes.com/religion/einstein.asp
It's even a stupid story: God's existence is supposed to be proven when the atheist professor does get knocked down within the allotted fifteen minutes--but he doesn't get knocked down by God; he only gets knocked down by a Marine whom we have no reason to think has any connection to God.
But I'm sure believers don't see it that way.
its not an urban legend. Its a JOKE, for crying out loud!
Word for the day:O-B-V-I-O-U-S
Another good point rarewinner. I have been on this site for weeks. Here is the pattern: If you cast a reasonable doubt on a premise they hold dear you will be ignored, usually on the grounds that you are poorly educated. If you try to obtain agreement on what constitutes proof they will evade on the grounds that all experts agree with them. Never mind that there are experts that disagree them. They feel that the evidence is "overwhelming". Never mind that some of us are underwhelmed.
In the race of gathering professional support, ID is losing, terribly.
And mean really terribly.
The Discovery Institute has put together a list of 700 biologists, who consider ID a viable possibility. Which isn't many.
Compare that to the tens of thousand of biologists world wide, who consider Common Descent to be not only possible, but a proven fact.
Possibly the funniest effort to highlight ID's lack of support was the Steve Project:http://ncse.com/taking-action/project-steve
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Steve
Whatever advantages ID may have going for it, a tsunami professional support isn't one of them.
(Yet.)