your saying that Einstein has 50 IQ?
What is average IQ?
Sort:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
IQ has no representation of intelligence and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to cover for their mediocore accomplishments in life. Even the creator of the test did not believe it had any real grounding.
What is a mediocre accomplishment?
That's up to you and your goals.
Who would take someone with a username containing "69" and "xxx" seriously? What a joke.
Who would take someone rated 670 seriously?
Rating doesn't matter in this case? Hello?
My name doesn't matter either then, at the very most it proves I don't take chess that seriously, but I think the fact you're rated 670 means you don't either.
Having "69" in your name is so childish. Grow up.
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
IQ has no representation of intelligence and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to cover for their mediocore accomplishments in life. Even the creator of the test did not believe it had any real grounding.
What is a mediocre accomplishment?
That's up to you and your goals.
Who would take someone with a username containing "69" and "xxx" seriously? What a joke.
Who would take someone rated 670 seriously?
Rating doesn't matter in this case? Hello?
My name doesn't matter either then, at the very most it proves I don't take chess that seriously, but I think the fact you're rated 670 means you don't either.
Having "69" in your name is so childish. Grow up.
being an idiot like u r is childish, grow up smh
uhhh
wot did i do
rebus2k wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
IQ has no representation of intelligence and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to cover for their mediocore accomplishments in life. Even the creator of the test did not believe it had any real grounding.
What is a mediocre accomplishment?
That's up to you and your goals.
Who would take someone with a username containing "69" and "xxx" seriously? What a joke.
Who would take someone rated 670 seriously?
Rating doesn't matter in this case? Hello?
My name doesn't matter either then, at the very most it proves I don't take chess that seriously, but I think the fact you're rated 670 means you don't either.
Having "69" in your name is so childish. Grow up.
being an idiot like u r is childish, grow up smh
What makes you think I'm an idiot? Grow up.
You went from a 2700 puzzles rating to a 2085 rating. Talk about no talent.
*me contemplating whether to change my name to xxx69xxx69xxx69 or something like that*
Nepotamy wrote:
rebus2k wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
IQ has no representation of intelligence and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to cover for their mediocore accomplishments in life. Even the creator of the test did not believe it had any real grounding.
What is a mediocre accomplishment?
That's up to you and your goals.
Who would take someone with a username containing "69" and "xxx" seriously? What a joke.
Who would take someone rated 670 seriously?
Rating doesn't matter in this case? Hello?
My name doesn't matter either then, at the very most it proves I don't take chess that seriously, but I think the fact you're rated 670 means you don't either.
Having "69" in your name is so childish. Grow up.
being an idiot like u r is childish, grow up smh
What makes you think I'm an idiot? Grow up.
You went from a 2700 puzzles rating to a 2085 rating. Talk about no talent.
alright, Ur 600 and 400 in puzzles. No talent
And I’ll be happy to whip your candy *** in a game anytime (given that I can)
permutatio probably has 69420 iq
rebus2k wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
rebus2k wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
Nepotamy wrote:
xXxchessxXx69 wrote:
IQ has no representation of intelligence and anyone who says otherwise is just trying to cover for their mediocore accomplishments in life. Even the creator of the test did not believe it had any real grounding.
What is a mediocre accomplishment?
That's up to you and your goals.
Who would take someone with a username containing "69" and "xxx" seriously? What a joke.
Who would take someone rated 670 seriously?
Rating doesn't matter in this case? Hello?
My name doesn't matter either then, at the very most it proves I don't take chess that seriously, but I think the fact you're rated 670 means you don't either.
Having "69" in your name is so childish. Grow up.
being an idiot like u r is childish, grow up smh
What makes you think I'm an idiot? Grow up.
You went from a 2700 puzzles rating to a 2085 rating. Talk about no talent.
alright, Ur 600 and 400 in puzzles. No talent
And I’ll be happy to whip your candy *** in a game anytime (given that I can)
Oh no. Someone is mad. A result of your low IQ?
speaking of mad and candy...
😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡🍬🍭🍡
I wanna get a real iq test, I just don’t know where.
MelvinGarvey wrote:
An average rating depends on the scale you use.
In the case of IQ, you'll find, generally, two types of scales (online):
1°) MENSA or MENSA like scales, and there, it's easy, average is 90-110, and the MENSA accept you for member if you score at least 135 at one of their tests (because it's the rare upper percentile's begining). It is estimated that Einstein was about 160-190 which is already sky high.
2°) various fantasy scales, likely to give you very odd and very large numbers for IQ, such as 500 and whatnot.
It all lies in what Jean de la Fontaine stated:
"Every flatterer lives at the expenses of who listen to them".
If Einstein were alive today, would he enjoy all the flattery there is about him?
rebus2K wrote : i feel like mine is pretty bad, judging by a person has like 225 IQ... I dont think so because there isnt any person that has 200 or 200+ IQ