Why evolution is bogus.

So unless you can see something with your own eyes, you do not believe in it?

Have you ever been to Australia?  Do you believe that it exists?

People who believe that Borislav Ivanov was not cheating should not be allowed to vote

I hope he wasn't using "observable" in that meaning.

But who knows...

I had heard rumours that Wyoming doesn´t exist.

I've been there. It doesn't.

I wonder if he understands that evolution takes too long to observe in a YouTube video.

I guess I won't have to refund you hip, each pays for his own, right ?

I have never been to Australia and I do have FAITH that it exists, I know people that live there. No one has EVER OBSERVED EVOLUTION!!!

I think the theory of evolution is brilliant! Very, very perceptive:)

In my view, as long as religions have magical beings, objects, and events in their beliefs then they don't value empiricism as highly as science does. Science is entirely based upon empiricism for facts--"the truth of the matter". Religion is entirely based upon imagination and emotion for facts--the "Truth". Logic tries to guide thinking for a consistent, non-contadictory view of the world. Faith focuses upon the strength of one's will to accept inconsistencies and contradictions for an eternal life in an imaginary world. It's Plato's "analogy of the cave" and The Matrix' "red or blue pill":)

Any comments about the pepper moth, or the annual flu shot ?

Or are you conveniently ignoring them ?

So, in the absence of direct personal experience, you are relying on other, overwhelming evidence that it exists.  Like the overwhelming evidence that evolution is true.

Even if it were a process which is not observable during the human lifetime (which is not the case; see the moths example), that does not make it not true.  You just have to use other forms of evidence.  And there are plenty.

@Irontiger

We have observed evolution...

'Yeah, trysts, you are correct.

I think when people argue about stuff, you get 3 types af argument:

• emotional vs emotional
• emotional vs logical
• logical vs logical

The first 2 can never be resolved  to the satisfaction of both parties. Only in the last case is there a chance that an argument can be 'won'

A fairy tale: A girl kisses a frog and it turns into a prince. Add millions of years and you have evolution. Yes, your relilgion is based entirely upon imagination and emotion for your "truth". I'm interested in proof not failed science. Interesting that you should bring up eternal life.

What have you observed???

Just follow you heart, if you ask sincerely, probably in your dreams you will get the answer.

(I guess that there´s people that prefer that type of investigation, since it doesn´t require serious effort)

I'm not sure if I follow you? The theory of evolution is pretty darn interesting, but of course it has not been able to account for human beings yet. But it is a new theory compared with the Abrahamic religion's theory of the origins of human beings, and is much more understandable than the Abrahamic religion's view, for me at least:)

I agree, rooperi:)