1,000+ bugs fixed since January: Please give us the list

Chess.com is mentioning in today's July Update article, that 1,000+ bugs have been fixed since January (more than 5 per day!). Here's a screenshot:

For me, this is quite surprising, as I've knowledge about bugs, which are lasting for weeks, months or even nearly two years now (for Multi Club Arenas). I wouldn't have expected, that Chess.com's programmers create more than 5 bugs per day to solve every day 5 of them some days/weeks/months later.

For transparency reasons, it would be great to get the list of all these 1,000+ fixed bugs since January 2023. This would allow all of us to understand better, what's going on on Chess.com.

Pretty sure the site isn't going to release such a list publicly.

They probably calculated bugs in individual games not those that affect site functionality.

Pretty sure that's not the case.

OK, Martin, you should know better.

@Martin_Stahl: Not really wondering about this as transparency isn't a favorite theme for Chess.com, is it?

Just a question: Why is Chess.com blaming their own programmers causing more than 5 bugs a day, if they don't feel comfortable with sharing all those bugs, that they've fixed?

Good thing chess.com programmers don't work for the Pentagon.

And speaking of transparency, has the 'b3' bug already been found, or is it on the list of 1000+ fixed bugs in project to fix in the next 6 months???

moral of the story: chess.com has a lot of bugs

also, 13K new CPU cores? thats 67 EPYCs (with 192 *threads*) and 134 with 96 cores(without threads)
note that these server CPUs cost a heck of $$$

There should be a fix coming out for that soon.

Large complex systems get bug in the process of coding and release. Not everything gets caught in implementation, QA, and beta testing. That's not uncommon, not even for larger companies with more resources.

Providing a comprehensive list doesn't really help anything, but a lot of the fixed bugs can be found by looking through Help and Support forums and the Beta club.

It's always a good approach to read your comments at least twice: Are you confirming, that "such a list" exists? What's the value informing in a monthly update about creating and fixing more than five bugs per day, if we aren't allowed to get more details about all this hard work?

I prefer not to know which are the 2000 bugs that are fixed each year. I think it is better to live in ignorance than in transparency.
But as a publicity claim I must admit that it is very good to know the high level of efficiency of the chess.com programmers.
Isn't it a strategy similar to the one used by politicians? Transparency but no.
We just want to play. Thousands of matches are waiting to be launched. Please give the matter a bit of priority.

I'd like to add to @Martin_Stahl's reply...

The number 1000+ doesn't surprise me.

Think of it this way... How many bugs have you (anyone reading this) reported since January 2023? Let's take ONE only.

Now, check out the below numbers...

Out of millions of total members, thousands of vigilant members help and support the site by reporting bugs and/or giving feedback. Plus, many members [outside of the above clubs] use "Report a Bug" frequently.

The number 1000+ doesn't surprise me at all.

@Pomb113: Sorry, this time 'm not with you.

Chess.com's lack of transparency is a major problem. It's near to impossible to get relevant and detailed information, what you're allowed to do or what the limits of options are.

Three simple examples: If you create a match name, which has "too many" characters, your challenges will not be created, it simply disappears. Wouldn't it be a simple alternative to limit writing as it is in club notes?

If you challenge "too many" clubs to a Multi Club Arena, your account get clocked and you can't do anything other in Chess.com's "Play" section until either the start of the Arena or a live server restart, which will crash your Arena.

If you send "too many" messages e.g. to prepare an upcoming match, you'll get muted for "club spamming". In none of these cases, you've a chance to check, what the limits are and what your situation is.

Don't think, that this is an appropriate, friendly or welcoming attitude towards users, is it?

@Tournamentix: In this as in almost everything I am with you. It is my ironic style of humor that sometimes makes it difficult to understand what I say with my messeges.
I think that the quality members of this community (I mean those who make the most use of it, not the level of play), we are paying a lot of money for subscriptions (also the others, of course, but especially those of us who pay for the new servers), and we deserve to know things like why ARENAS have failed due to the numerous bugs, clubs are weakening for fear of spam or we cannot continue our competitions normally.

@Pomb113: Nothing against irony.

What make things difficult is e.g. the fact, that Chess.com often don't understand, what is explained load, clearly and repeated. Maybe it's due to a lack of listening, interest or understanding. Maybe also, that we are too often confusing them with unstandardized, overdetailed or unticketable statements.

The luck of feedback on the site is frustrating. You never know what happening after you submit a report - Is it taken seriously or fully ignored?

Regarding QA work - sometimes it seems that it does not exists and all the bugs are being caught/noticed by users. Some of those bugs were so obvious that it should never been thru in the release still we are talking about bugs being fixed after release.

I'm thankful for being able to enjoy playing chess on chess.com still would like experience be more pleasant. And for me personally those on the site creating spam games/tournaments/ratings and cheating are most annoying.

1000 is the amount of blunders i make in a day so that could have smth to do with this?