Chess.com doesn't care about their paying customers?

Being fooled's got nothing to do with it. Suspiciously, it seems you wished I was a child and created an excuse to engage with me. And for what, to provide a solution? No. To suggest an alternative path of resolution? No. To offer any fact-based reasoning whatsoever? Hell no. I mean, I dunno maybe trying to assert your (imagined) intellectual dominance is the paedophile version of negging but I know I speak for actual adults when I say we don't go trying to chat with random children for no good reason.

I'm in no way responsible for how you choose to interpret what you read, especially when you're exceptionally poor at doing so correctly. There isn't a single message I've posted in this or any other thread that points to me taking the bug I reported as a direct slight to myself personally, and everything I've stated is fact-based. I mean, if you don't know what a fact is you can just admit you don't.

Ok so I'll just skip past that reactionary insult from you being triggered and say the simple answer would be to get the job done. If they cared about fixing the problem but don't have capable staff, why wouldn't they hire anyone who is. And again, nothing in what you've stated is a fact - no one cares about your presumptions of how you think organisations run.

But I get it, you don't wanna climb down from your horse - it does look crazy high up there - so let me extend to you this parachute by means of an analogy that even you should understand...

In the real world, as you say, if you tried this cute stuff with me I'd likely not reply and just punch you in the face, shut it down real quick. So now you run crying to the police and they say they confirm it's a crime and will be charging me as soon as possible where I'll face jail time. They later follow up to assure you they're still working on the charging documents. Then they turn around and say the police department have determined it's not a crime and won't be making any arrests. What would your assumptions then be?

stop lying already
the new review is the same poc it was when it first came out
Still tons of missing features, non cohesive UIs, etc.
Wtf is there no button to flip the board on the review ? Why do i have to click on the (quite hidden) analysis button to then click the flip button and click on review again ?
Why is the graph going from top to bottom ?
Please explain any of these é"''-ù$^ù$ decisions that make no sense.

Martin may be right. It does not seem so bad as it was when the first changes were made.

Flip is right beside the board; hover your cursor over the upper-right of the board.

As to the why the graph moves, my guess it was decided it was most pertinent on the summary screen but when actually reviewing it was thought it made more sense to have the moves at the top.

What page are you talking about?

This is an absurd statement but it demonstrates what kind of individual I'm dealing with here.

Children are not as constantly enraged over nothing as you. Tween is a term for an overgrown 20 year old, which is what I imagine you are, not a young child. But even if you were a child you wouldn't get a free pass to attack and berate people online, I'd expect the adults online to correct your behavior and as a parent, if my son were behaving that way, I'd be perfectly content with other adults putting him in his place.

But I can see you don't like anyone standing up to your aggression and your rudeness. However, as desperate as you are to win and continue behaving according to no personal ethics or standards whatsoever, using an accusation of pedophilia to empower yourself in response is taking things way beyond where they would normally go. I find this direction of the conversation concerning - that's not an accusation that should be casually and instrumentally used to win an argument on the internet. Pedophilia is an egregious act and a serious criminal offense, we should reserve accusations like that for legitimate scenarios where it could be happening, the term should not be sensationalized and used to empower yourself to win an online argument. You seem very numb and oblivious to this.

This is the predictable sort of behavior I would expect from someone with an antisocial personality disorder, which I could already see that you have based on your earlier attacks toward staff. Me, I have no interest in beating random strangers who question my authority to try and prop up my fragile ego or whatnot, don't have a personal need for that kind of validation but I understand that you desperately do need it -

Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD): Symptoms & Treatment (clevelandclinic.org)

Cluster B Personality Disorders: Symptoms, Treatment, and More (webmd.com)

Carry onward!

No, it doesn't, it means late teens or early twenties, hence the "twe" for twenties. You've gotten incorrect information, probably from the top of google, which is wrong often. The "twe" in tween makes no sense for a pre-teen, it is the beginning part of twenty. i.e. extended teenage-hood going into the twenties, which is common these days.

Not that it really matters but tween is generally meant to be between 10-12, just before 13.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/tween

That makes no sense to me but okay, I stand corrected.

Why are people complaining about game review? If they don't like it here then get a game review on lichess or something. The old game review is definitely better, but the new one is actually pretty good.

You don't need to be 'dealing' with anyone, you chose to insert yourself into a conversation that had nothing to do with you for no good reason simply because you chose to perceive it as me attacking someone, and a seemingly uncontrollable need to.. correct a stranger on the internet's behaviour ? That is the very foundation on which this entire absurdity is built.

I made no accusation, I simply stated your behaviour was sus and stand by it, especially since that may be how you choose to use the word tween, but the actual definition - as has already been pointed out - is essentially a child. And you don't need to have APSD to understand that sometimes violence is the best answer, you need only be human and live in the real world.

What you're failing to grasp here is that you're imagining you're standing up to me and that there's any sort of opposition here, when the reality is I don't care about you in the slightest. There is nothing to be won and you're the only one in this so-called online argument. The same way you inserted yourself is the same way you can remove yourself. Just stop responding.

I wasn't offered anything, I said that I offered. And I'm not assuming anything, if you read my posts prior to me being engaged in nonsense you'll see that what I stated is specifically what I've been told.

That's not correct. Staff do take feedback and have implemented things based on feedback. They won't do everything suggested but that doesn't mean they don't do any

As for the other point: https://www.chess.com/article/view/chesscom-update-august-2024#FairPlay

https://www.chess.com/fair-play

RCN stands for Royal Canadian Navy.

Real-time Chess Network

is English not your first language or are you just choosing to read incorrectly?

They did not offer me, I am the one who offered them. It's really not that complicated.