In this position, game review gave the opponents move Qe7, "Good". It was probably the worst move playable in the position. It brings the evaluation from -5 to -21. There should be an update for this, as it is just a clean blunder, no questions asked. Not sure why the new updates to game review were added.
When one side is completely lost any move is considered as good as any other from a classification standpoint.
In this position, game review gave the opponents move Qe7, "Good". It was probably the worst move playable in the position. It brings the evaluation from -5 to -21. There should be an update for this, as it is just a clean blunder, no questions asked. Not sure why the new updates to game review were added.
When one side is completely lost any move is considered as good as any other from a classification standpoint.
He's got a point, bro.
Go fix this. -21 on eval should not be labeled as a "good move."
If you're really that lazy, you can put the letter i-icon on eval scores where it would give more information about the position when mouse cursor is hovered on the i-icon.
I figured this evaluation glitch a long time ago on my own. Here we are years later, and it's still not fixed.
l