I will note as a point of interested for those who might find and analyse this game, here is the game
I believe the suspected 'brilliant' which is mis-identified was the rook sacrificing itself for the knight to subdue the attack on the f7 pawn on move 29, as it is the only 'good, sacrificing move' in this game.
But please let me know if you think otherwise
With the new system of showing 'positive' instead of negative moves there needs to be a setting for it to show which moves you want to see.
Not every game needs to be analysed, but when you know there is a blunder despite winning you want to know before hopping into a game analysis, it also feels pretty useless to be told you had 5 great moves in a game you lost.
The pain is that there is already a setting but it dosen't allow you to select which move types you want to see:
What's even worse now is that I'm getting 'click-baited' into game reviews with 'fake' brilliants. Take this last game of mine
Exciting right?
The most frustrating part is seeing the 'setting' for the feature show the moves I care about analysing (misses, blunders, and brilliants) and showing me completely different moves.