Shirov slates proposal Ilyumzhinov

| 0 | Chess Event Coverage
On the website of the Association of Chess Professionals, two letters by Alexei Shirov were published recently, in which he slates Kirsan Ilyumzhinov's recent proposal concerning the world championship cycle. In the first letter he says that 'anarchy' will enter chess when Kramnik is given a match whatever his result in Mexico in September will be. Besides, Ilyumzhinov had also stated that by choosing for proposal A, he followed the wish of the top grandmasters, which is refuted by Shirov in a second letter.

Shirov in his first letter:

"Giving Mr. Kramnik a match in 2008 regardless the results in Mexico would only add the anarchy into our sport and therefore both proposals A and B are totally unacceptable. They also contradict your previous public statements and change the rules during the cycle. Finally there can not be two different democracies - one for a particular player and the other for the rest of the chess world."

Shirov in his second letter:

"Here are some facts:

The ACP Board made the statement that the organization (although not every ACP Board member, well they simply meant me, as I am against either option) clearly supported the option 'B'.

After your decision was published at least three Candidates approached ACP saying that they definitely didn't support 'A' option but didn't mind the 'B' option.

One more candidate stated that (like yours truly) he considered both 'A' and 'B' options to be wrong but if he were still to choose, he would have chosen the option 'B'.

Then while browsing on the internet I found out an interesting quote from Magnus Carlsen's family blog:

It's (too) tempting to comment briefly on FIDE's recent decision on the structure of the future World Championship cycles. They did ask a number of the top players' advice, and consequently the choice of alternative A (the World Cup winner plays the reigning World Champion, no more World Championship tournaments after Mexico) comes as a surprise. Magnus did not support this, and I don't think many of the (other) top players did either. It reintroduces the old privileges of the reigning World Champion, and hence creates grand privileges for V. Kramnik.

Henrik Carlsen March 5, 2007"

It remains a difficult issue. To what extend does a world champion 'deserve' it to rest on his laurels until a new candidate has managed to fight himself up onto the highest chess stage? What privileges should the world champion have?
Peter Doggers

Peter Doggers joined a chess club a month before turning 15 and still plays for it. He used to be an active tournament player and holds two IM norms.

Peter has a Master of Arts degree in Dutch Language & Literature. He briefly worked at New in Chess, then as a Dutch teacher and then in a project for improving safety and security in Amsterdam schools.

Between 2007 and 2013 Peter was running ChessVibes, a major source for chess news and videos acquired by in October 2013.

As our Director News & Events, Peter writes many of our news reports. In the summer of 2022, The Guardian’s Leonard Barden described him as “widely regarded as the world’s best chess journalist.”

In October, Peter's first book The Chess Revolution will be published!

Company Contact and News Accreditation: 

Phone: 1 (800) 318-2827
Address: PO Box 60400 Palo Alto, CA 94306

More from PeterDoggers
Arjun Erigaisi Briefly World #5 As Menorca Open Winner

Arjun Erigaisi Briefly World #5 As Menorca Open Winner

Isa Kasimi (Igors Rausis) 1961-2024

Isa Kasimi (Igors Rausis) 1961-2024