Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Another Little Genius??

[previous round]

In round 5 of the Western States Open, I was surprised to be paired with young (12 yrs old?) Luke Harmon-Vellotti of Idaho. Despite losing in round 4 I had 3/4 and I thought that I should still be in line for an IM or GM. I thought I had played Luke in the previous year's National Open and that he had been barely a 2000 level at the time, so I was surprised that he'd have 3 points.

But when I sat down to play him, I saw that his rating was 2292, not just a master now, but a strong one! And I remembered that the night before I had seen him playing against John Daniel Bryant, a strong 2400 player. Uh-oh! Afraid of losing the game at the outset by knowing less opening theory than him (on the chance that he studies opening theory), I reluctantly decided while thinking on my first move to switch from my intended 1.e4 to 1.c4. I've been making that decision more and more often lately, and I want to feel free to play e4, and stop being so worried. My goal for round 5 was actually simply to play 1.e4 in order to help myself get over this growing fear. But during the first minute or two of the game while I thought about my move, another thought occured to me: perhaps my better results lately were partly due to the fact that I had been employing some fear and prudence, rather than just brashly playing the wild stuff I like.

And so, once again, prudence got the better of me, and another English game unfolded:

(for those who are interested in the common structure that arose in this game, check out this terrific article).

Luke played extremely well, and pretty confidently as well, I would say, within the confines of a worrisome position. Whereas the first time I played him I thought he was not even worth his rating, he now appears to me to be worth *more* his much-improved rating. I was really impressed. And he finished the tournament with the better side of a draw (with black again!) against scary-good IM Mackenzie Molner, to finish undefeated and push his rating over 2300. Wow!

It turns out, my previous encounter with him was in 2009 not 2010, so it makes some sense that he has improved so much, though it's still an extraordinary progress. And it turns out that this year he made his first IM norm at a tournament where he defeated two GMs. So, definitely another important young talent in the American chess scene.

As for me, I was definitely disappointed not to win this game. It felt like I had been so close, and it had slipped away from me; and it left me really questioning my focus. Had I blinked at some point? Not made quite enough effort at the moment I needed to? Should I not have strolled around the room and lost a minute here or there off my clock? (I used to sit still at the board pretty much till the end of a game, but at this tournament I drank water, strolled the hall, checked out other games, and went to the bathroom: it was more enjoyable and I got less tired, and that has its advantages as well).

But, I knew that my main goal at this event was "the first and last," so after lunching, I put this game behind me, and thought only of the main event.

[last round]

Comments


  • 20 months ago

    WindowsEnthusiast

    @eliandauer, I mean the final position, because ...e3 would allow White to make passed pawns on the kingside.

  • 20 months ago

    Twobit

    Good article.

  • 20 months ago

    elindauer

    I'm afraid I have no idea what you mean.  It seems you are saying that 17.d4 will not be met by 17... e4 due to 18.g4, but that is crazy.  You must mean some other position, but I don't know what.  Can you clarify?

  • 20 months ago

    WindowsEnthusiast

    @elindauer: The e-pawn isn't going anywhere, especially since any e-pawn advance may be met by the shot g4!, which only increases Black's problems by creating a protected/connected passed pawn.

  • 20 months ago

    mobidi

    @ dpruess Thanks David , but this idea is not my-i take it from the game Smyslov-Liberson (Riga 1968)-.Smyslov was really big genius of chess-harmony.Good Luck!

  • 20 months ago

    mobidi

    @ elindauer David Copperfield or Harry Houdini ? Game is game-d3 or d4-beat or wait? d3 is good as psychological decision (vs boy),but really d4 is better (for old geniusSmile ) Good Luck!

  • 20 months ago

    IM dpruess

    i have not played mobidi's line out on a board, but it looks very interesting to me. there are some ideas in there i had not considered for myself/white. i'll have a deeper look later, thanks, mobidi!

  • 20 months ago

    elindauer

    If only there were some impartial, highly strong chess player we could go to for the answer... oh wait, there is!

     

    Houdini's analysis of this position is highly dependent on depth.  It tends to slightly favor 17.d4, but d3 is typically within .05 pawns behind, so they are probably similar.  Of course no one can calculate like a computer engine, so David probably discounted this pawn structure as it will typically favor black due to white's need to play f3 at some point, which creates weaknesses in the white kingside.  With time a consideration, he may have been quick to avoid Houdini's main line of d4 e4 Qb3 voluntarily pinning the c4 pawn.  This turns out to be ok because white is going to push d5 and relieve the pressure very quickly.

     

    Actually as I write this d3 continues to rise, it is effectively dead equal with d4 at a depth of 23.  In fact they are both passed (barely) by the line Rb1 Nd7 d3.  This suggests that David's understanding of the long-term implications of the pawn structure might be correct.  It also suggests that this is a maneuvering position (ie, not sharp) and that the most important element is forming a cohesive plan that you understand to improve your position over the course of the next 5-10 moves. With that in mind, David's decision is clearly correct for him, he chose an excellent plan and pawn structure that he understood well.

     

    Neither d3 nor d4 can reasonably be described as a mistake imo.  They appear to be simply different plans of equal merit.

  • 20 months ago

    mydixiewrecked

    @mobidi

    I don't really have a dog in this fight, but I think it's funny how you give almost half of the moves you suggest an exclam.

  • 20 months ago

    mobidi

    @ IM dpruess... and what-after 17....e4-end of the world or maybe end of the Bishop ?-no!after 17.d4! e4 18.Nf4 Bf7 19.Qb4 Nc8 20.Bf1! (Bishop find other good diagonal-and looks to Q-side!) 20....Bf8 21.Qb7!  Qb7 22.Rb7 Nb6 23.d5! cd 24.cd! -not only conceptual,but concrete too!

  • 20 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    LOL

  • 20 months ago

    IM dpruess

    uhhhh, of course i know about "the center" i've studied chess extensively. on both moves you are suggesting, d4 is answered by e4, and white's g2-bishop gets shut out, and c4-pawn is left hanging, restricting his tactical options on the qside. i don't see the variations that give white an advantage there. and to say that d4 is conceptual does not prove that it's right. there is concept behind Rb2 and d3 as well, obviously. chess is concrete as well as conceptual, and you need to be able to provide a variation showing that white gets the upper-hand with d4. as i played, white did have the upper-hand, so you'd have to prove an even larger advantage for white in order to call my moves mistakes.

  • 20 months ago

    mobidi

    @ IM dpruess....Yes! of course,but it was better than Rb2 or d3?-more conceptual-just remember A.Nimzowtsch,or M.Botvinnik-just remember center-very old rule....

  • 20 months ago

    IM dpruess

    mobidi, i looked at d4 on all those moves, and i think it's not good (except on move 1)

  • 20 months ago

    elindauer

    @r_heavilin: the final position is an easy theoretical draw even if you remove both black pawns.  If you push f6 black blockades on the light squares, if you push e6 they sac the bishop.  The knowledge of this position is what lets the young master play his moves in this endgame so easily:

     

  • 20 months ago

    mobidi

    Funny!13.! b5:c6-was no good-in this english position-only d4 !!-is typical and very strong.(but,of course,-young man played very well !).14.d4! (14.Rb2?!) and 17.d4! (17.d3?)-shows that d2-d4-is really strong in chess-and not only 1.d2-d4!

  • 20 months ago

    h3lo123

    great game

  • 20 months ago

    r_heaivilin

    nice game;  however i don't understand the draw by repetion.

     Why not try to move your king  e4 toward his a-file pawn?   If he checks, then move and push your f pawn when he reattacks it.

    i think it is still likely to draw, but the  mistakes are his to make with e & f pawns safe from his bishop.

  • 20 months ago

    werdnabd1

    cool

  • 20 months ago

    emileokada

    @Crosswire

    Read David's comments.

    If e6 then he sacs his bishop for both pawns and draws.

Back to Top

Post your reply: