Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Phillip Stamma - No Chess Stammerer ;-)

  • qtsii
  • | Sep 23, 2008 at 9:57 AM
  • | Posted in: The Q Factor
  • | 1660 reads
  • | 6 comments

 

 

Philipp Stamma (c.1705–1755), a native of Aleppo, Syria, later resident of England and France, was a chess master and a pioneer of modern chess. Stamma was a regular at Slaughter's Coffee House in St. Martin's Lane (London), a center of 18th century English chess, and was considered one of England's strongest players.

 

His reputation rests largely on his authorship of the early chess book The Noble Game Of Chess (published 1737 in France; English translation 1745). This book brought the Middle Eastern concept of the endgame to the attention of Europe and helped revive European interest in the study of the endgame.

 

Stamma was defeated quite handily by Philidor in a famous match in 1747, which marked the beginning of Philidor's rise to fame.

Stamma's book introduced algebraic chess notation in an almost fully developed form before the now obsolete descriptive chess notation evolved. Philidor's writings had more influence after his his victory over Stamma, and the descriptive system based on Philidor's approach was dominant for a long time.

 

He died in London in 1755, with two sons surviving him.

 

 

Interested in Stamma's mate see  here

 

 

 


Comments


  • 4 years ago

    mathijs

    My, your quick. But I was actually hoping you (or batgirl, hence the neutral "person") would be that insightful person clearing things up on mate in 5/6 issue.

  • 4 years ago

    qtsii

    Thank you very much that is some very insightful observations !

  • 4 years ago

    mathijs

    Thanks for the information. About the problems rhat Batgirl presented, I think the solution to the second one is: 1.Nh6+ Kh8 2.Nf7++ Kg8 3.Qxg7+ Kxg7 4.Rh7+ Kg8 5.Nh6#

     

    I've racked my brain for some time over the first problem, but I finally caved and fed it to the computer. The thing confirmed my suspicions that it is actually a mate in six (and a rather lame one at that, much weaker than the second, where the sacrifice is hidden): 1.Qh8+ Rxh8 2.Nf6+ Kg7 3.Nxe7+ Qc3 4.Bxc3+ Kh7 (4...Kg8 5.Rf8+ Kh7 6.Rxh8#) 5.Rf7+ Kg8 6.Rg7#

    I realize that the move 3...Qc3 isn't really part of the combination and that it is an old problem (with the unusual heading "red to win in five" rather than "(white to) mate in five"), so maybe they were not as strict about these matters back then. Perhaps a more knowledgeable person could shed some light on that.

  • 5 years ago

    qtsii

    Thanks Batgirl - you always supply the best info!

  • 5 years ago

    batgirl

    William Lewis re-wrote some of Stamma's book and published it in 1819:

                                       

                

     A couple of nice puzzles by Stamma:

                            

     

                                 

  • 5 years ago

    Tycho

    If I remember correctly, there is a widely used "1001 problems", tactical chess puzzles authored or atributed to Stamma. Didn't know of his story, thanks a lot!

Back to Top

Post your reply: