How to Learn Chess

I responded to an old thread, but I figured this post would help others so I'm posting it here.

Ok, I know this thread is really old, but I read about your problem and just had to reply. So, I hope you get this.

Improvement in chess is a constant problem, because it is true, that for most people, improvement happens in leaps, and not gradually. But there are two fundamental problems within the chess community. 1. ALMOST NO ONE knows how to actually teach chess. The reason is because they simply don't know how to teach. There are a few writers and coaches who know how to teach but they are few and far between. Some who can teach include, Jeremy Silman, Cyrus Lakdawala, Andy Soltis, John Nunn...etc. But for the most part no one knows how to teach chess and that is evident because no one knows where to start.

The only consensus is to start with tactics. Spend about a month to three months on them. For this I recommend the website Chesstactics.org. He has an EXCELENT way of teaching tactics and shows you how to find them even a couple of moves away. And this will help you with your calculation. If the website doesn't work for you, he has two books which have everything on the website called Predator at the Chessboard vol. 1 and 2. An example, is when looking for knight forks do a color scan. When a knight moves it ALWAYS jumps to a different color square. When a knight fork is 1 move away, the knight and the two pieces it is attacking will all be on the same color. When the knight moves it will jump to a different color but it will be able to attack both pieces. He explains this better on his site and books because you have diagrams to see what he means. There are many benefits to starting with tactics. 1. You learn how to do tactics. 2. By learning how to spot tactics, you learn how to avoid your opponent's tactics during the game. 3. And probably the most important lesson is they teach you precise calculation.

Now the problem is where to start AFTER you learn tactics and on this there is NO consensus. Some people like to start with endgames. There are many reasons for this, 1. It can teach you basic mates. 2. There are less pieces on the board so it's easier to understand. 3. It teaches you to coordinate your pieces. But there are three major problems with this. 1. A beginner will NEVER reach the endgame. They aren't good enough yet and as a result will probably get mated long before then. 2. Many of the strategies for the endgame are reversed in the middlegame. Examples, centralizing your king/castling your king, rooks behind pawns/rooks in front of pawns etc. So most of what a person learns in the endgame they cannot use UNLESS they get to an endgame. Finally, even if a beginner gets to the endgame, it's going to be a bad endgame because they don't know how to steer play to a favorable endgame during the opening or middlegame.

After studying chess seriously I believe a person should learn opening principles, then opening STRATEGY first. NOT OPENINGS. The reasons are, opening theory is vast, and it can take a long time to memorize it all. 2. The consensus on Openings is that studying them should be held off for a long time. You REALLY don't need to study openings on any serious level until you reach about 2000 elo. 3. Many people worry about memorizing their openings instead of understanding their openings. This is a problem because once you leave the variations you want to play, you are lost and don't know what to do. The consensus here is: memorization is OK, understanding is better, and understanding PLUS memorization is best. As such you need to understand the foundations of opening strategy in order to understand the openings you play, and what they are really trying to accomplish over the board. For this I recommend Mastering Opening Strategy by Johan Hellsten.

This will help you fair a little better in the opening whether you know actual openings such as the Queens Gambit or Sicilian, or you just play chess and follow opening principles. It will also teach you the circumstances under which you should break those principles, and how you should punish those that do break them.

Then you should learn the principles of the middlegame. The absolute best book I have EVER read on this subject is Simple Chess by Michael Stean. This books is even better than Amateur's Mind and Reassess Your Chess, because this gives you a solid plan on how to approach the game from the opening to the endgame and it also shows you how to use your pieces and pawns together as an interdependent whole. Plus it illustrates the three major aspects of Middlegame Strategy: Pawn Structure, Pieces, and how they work together. To supplement this book I recommend Rethinking the Chess Pieces, and Pawn Structure Chess by Andy Soltis. Rethinking the Chess Pieces, teaches you about how the pieces actually function together, and how to spot and use Imbalances between the pieces to your advantage. For example, the value chart says that a Queen vs. 2 Rooks is roughly equal. But any one who has played with only a queen on the board, with their opponent having two rooks will tell you it's not, for one reason. 2 pieces are better than one. A queen cannot be in two places at once. Pawn structure chess will teach you the most common pawn structures and how to use them to your advantage.

One of the things I have found over my year of study is Masters know how to change a pawn structure to their advantage, and as Michael Stean says in Simple Chess, “The Middlegame is a problem of structure, and the most important feature of that structure is piece activity. You must use your pawns to free and support your pieces.” These three books together will show you how to do that. And to prove it, in Rethinking the Chess Pieces, Soltis says the three most important features of the pieces in a position are: Mobility, Coordination, and Targets. Mobility, Coordination, and Targets are the three features of piece activity. Piece activity is the most important feature of the position, and pawns must free (grant piece activity) and support your pieces, while preventing your opponent from doing the same thing. I can truly say, that the whole game of chess revolves around those three things. See how they are related? Pawn Structure Chess will teach you how to best change that structure and use that structure to your advantage. This is important because piece activity is determined by pawn structure, and pawn structure is determined by the opening.

Also, Soltis is the absolute best at showing how chess players actually think, and debunking a lot of myths about that thinking. So much so, that his books The Inner Game, and How to Choose a Chess Move, actually disproves the necessity of How to Think Like a Grandmaster. Kotov's method is really only useful in certain situations. These two books will show you what those situations are, and teach you how to really think during a game. This cannot be overestimated. Chess is a THINKING game. I can guarantee that the biggest reason you are not improving is because you are overlooking something at the board. There is something you are not seeing, and chances are it's because you are not considering enough candidate moves. That is what these two books are about.

Read the books in this order:

The Inner Game

How to Choose a Chess Move

Mastering Opening Strategy

Rethinking the Chess Pieces

Simple Chess

Pawn Structure Chess

Now, the second major problem with learning chess is that the people who study chess, don't know how to learn. This is a problem with most people when learning anything. The reason is because learning is a skill, it is not something you automatically know. As a result people waste a lot of time trying to learn something, and then they fail because they get frustrated and don't know why they couldn't learn it. There is a specific philosophy to learning and here it is.

Philosophy of learning.

1. The best way to find a solution is to accurately define the problem.

2. The brain cannot learn anything it does not already know.

3. Everyone Learns differently, based upon seeing, hearing, or doing, and you must identify how you learn.

4. Repetition is the royal road to learning.

5. Once you are emotional about a subject, you know it/if you can teach a subject you know it.

Now, what does all this mean. When I started taking chess seriously, I had no idea what I was doing. And honestly no one else did either for the reasons I have already mentioned. I wasted three months before I had any idea how to approach learning the game I love so much. Then I remembered some things my sensei in Karate had been telling me over the years and I started using them for chess and, honestly it has worked beyond my wildest dreams. The reason for this is because I am a trained Philosopher, and as a philosopher I know that all of our actions are determined by how we think, and look at the world. So by remembering my Sensei's teachings I realized I had a philosophy of learning and so I used it.

First I defined the problem, which I hope this post is doing for you. Then I devised a plan based on the definition of the problem, but I organized the plan according the 4 other principles.

The Brain cannot learn anything it doesn't already know. What this means is, the structure of the brain must have something to build from in order to learn it. This takes the form of synapses. If you are going to learn anything the brain must have a synapse to build from. This is why a person who doesn't know how to add or subtract, cannot learn how to do Algebra. They don't have the basic foundation to build from. So this is what I did. As I bought books, I organized and read them from easy to hard, in such a way as they built from one another. This is what I did for you with the six books I recommended already. They are put in an order that will reinforce what you read previously as you move through the list, and as such will help you understand what you will read.

I noticed you have the Art of the Attack. So do I, but what you have to understand is, the Art of the Attack is one of those books you will read for the rest of your life. And when you reread it six months to a year from now, you will pull more from it than you did the first time you read it. It is a VERY advanced book, and honestly it is not the book you should start out with learning how to attack. You should start out with Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson. This is a small book that has they very basic foundational principles of attack. Chances are you won't become an attacking genius from reading this book, but it serves as a foundation for attacking play. Now I'm reading Attacking the King by Yakov Neishtadt. This book is filling in the gaps of Simple Attacking Plans. But because I have read Simple Attacking Plans and am applying what it said to Attacking the King, I am learning a lot more about attacking, which I really suck at. THEN after I've read this book, I will read The Art of the Attack. But not before I read these two books, and know a lot more about tactics. This way I have a foundation to build from, and therefore a way to understand and approach Art of the Attack.

So, what I did is I took the absurd number of books I bought on chess, around 60, and organized them in order from easy to hard, in such a way that I can build on the information I learned from earlier books, and apply them to later books. I will put this list at the end of this post.

Another one of the consensus ideas among titled players is to study grand master games. Now it's not that this advice is wrong, but it is HORRIBLY incomplete. You shouldn't start out studying master games right way. The reason is because you have NOTHING to base what you are looking at on. Yes they make the best moves, but you as the reader don't know WHY they are making those moves. So first you must learn the strategies they are using and how they are analyzing the board BEFORE you study grandmaster games. This is why I have 6 phases to my chess study.

Phases of Study

1. Basic Strategy and Tactics

2. Technique of Restriction

3. Defense and Dynamics

4. Openings and Endgame

5. Soviet Chess Strategy

6. Grand Master Games

Look at all the steps I am going through BEFORE I study grandmaster games. (Note, I have two complete steps before I start learning openings.) This is because I know the Brain cannot learn anything it doesn't already know.

Everyone Learns Differently. No two people learn exactly the same way. But there are three areas of classification you can use as a general guideline. People learn with some combination of Seeing, Hearing, and Doing. What this means is some people are better at learning if they can physically see what they are doing. This is where charts, and videos comes into play. Others, learn by hearing, they can learn from listening to a lecture, or reading a book. Then there is doing, which means a person learns by the physical action of doing something. In this case, PLAYING chess. If you learn by doing the best thing for you to do, is to play.

When a person recommends how to learn chess on Chess.com their comments will fit into one of these three categories, and they are using what works best for them. You need to find what works best for YOU. I personally learn by hearing, so I am able to learn from a book very well. Others are not able too. But they still need the information, so they can't avoid the book, but, maybe they learn better from videos to get information. Or maybe they read a little bit and learn best when they apply it to their own games. Chess.com is really good for both of these areas.

Repetition is the royal road to learning. This is probably the most important principle, other than the brain cannot learn anything it doesn't already know. The reason is because you must be consistent in your practice and study of chess if you want to get better. For example, I learn from hearing, so I read a lot of chess books. But it doesn't stop there. I am taking notes as a read. Then I go through the notes and reduce them to their bare essentials, getting to the core idea they are trying to tell me. Then pull out all the information, as it relates to certain subjects. I put all the information about the pieces in one place, information about pawns in another place, attacking in another place, the center...etc. Then I take those notes and I see how they relate to other notes I have taken. I see how my notes from Mastering Opening Strategy, relates to Simple Chess, which relates to Rethinking the Chess Pieces. Then I take that information and apply it to all of my games, whether online or over the board. This way I am constantly working with the information I am reading until I am emotional about it, and can teach it, then I know it.

Now the other reason I do this is because I am a relational thinker. I am very good at taking individual things and ideas and seeing how they relate to one another. This is why taking the notes and seeing how they relate to each other is so important for me. But this is how I'm learning, it may or may not work for you. But this is the problem about chess. EVERYTHING in chess relates to EVERYTHING else. It is relational thinking. This is why those who play chess, regardless of skill level, improve in their other studies because it teaches them to think in relational ways. And this happens whether you realize it or not.

I hope this helps. I know it's long, but that is the nature of chess. There is SO much you need to know in order to get better. Honestly right now I”m at about 1500. But, I have gone from 1100 to 1500 in a year, and they say it should take about a year to go up 100 points. And I have done this basically without help. I don't have a trainer. I have a few friends I play with at my chess club. But I have basically learned on my own. So I think going up 300 in a year is pretty good. And I am still learning and I am still getting better. The key is to keep going even when I get a little discouraged, but at the moment I get discouraged it seems something happens and I get better.

I will end with this. I am not very good at attacking, so I am reading Attacking the King. One of the principles when attacking is to trade off the defenders. Even though I have read this in multiple places I never really understood it, until, while reading Attacking the King, I noticed all the space around the king as defenders were being traded off. This allowed the remaining pieces to attack the EXPOSED king. I never noticed that before, and noticing it changed my understanding of this principle, and therefore how I thought about it. This is one example of how the learning process functions during your study. And it is one example of why people don't improve, because even though they are reading things their understanding of it, isn't evolving.

I hope this helps.

Chess Study Plan

Phase I: Basic Strategy and Tactics

Simple Chess

Simple Attacking Plans

Rethinking the Chess Pieces

How to Choose a Chess Move

The Tao of Chess

The Amateur’s Mind

How to Reassess Your Chess 4^th ed.

Mastering Opening Strategy

Pawn Structure Chess

Understanding Pawn Play

Dynamic Pawn Play

Pawn Power in Chess

Chess: 5334 Problems, Combinations, and Games

Predators at the Chess Board I

Predators at the Chess Board II

Attacking the King

Art of the Attack

Sacrifice and Initiative

Mastering Endgame Strategy

Catalog of Chess Mistakes

Phase II: Restriction

My System

GM Milik Kachiam Videos

Karpov's 7 Bases of Restriction

Karpov's Strategic Wins I

Karpov's Strategic Wins II

Life and Games of Tigran Petrosian

Phase III: Defense and Dynamics

Art of Defense in Chess

Petrosian's Legacy

How to Defend in Chess

Secrets of Defense in Chess

How to Play Dynamic Chess

Dynamic Chess Strategy

Phase IV: Openings and Endgame

Mastering the Chess Openings: Vol 2*

Play the London System

Playing 1d4: the Queen's Gambit*

Play the Queen's Gambit *

The Slav Move by Move

The Caro-Kann Move by Move

The Colle Move by Move

The Torre Move by Move

Starting Out: The Scandanavian

The Modern Scandinavian

Silman's Complete Endgame Course

Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual

Secrets of Pawn Endings*

Phase V: Soviet School and Modern Strategy

My System

A Contemporary Approach to the Middlegame

Soviet Chess Strategy

Soviet Middlegame Technique

Questions of Modern Chess Theory

The Ragozin Complex

Lessons with a Grandmaster I

Lessons with a Grandmaster II

Positional Chess Sacrifices

Sacking the Citadel*

Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy

Road to Chess Improvement

Phase VI: Grandmaster Games

Studying Chess Made Easy

What it Takes to Become a Chess Master

Life and Games of Tigran Petrosian

The Games of Tigran Petrosian I

The Games of Tigran Petorsain II

Karpov's Strategic Wins I

Karpov's Strategic Wins II

Gelfend: My Most Memorable Games

Complete Games of Bobby Fischer

Capablanca Move by Move

thats hard

AMAZING POST!! THANXTONS!!!  

Bookmarking  

You're Welcome

Very instructive, but who can anticipate all this study program in a lifetime?

Well, I did for one.  But given that I concieved this almost a year ago it has changed, and I've added more books to it.  Right now I'm doing a very serious investigation into pawns.  "Understanding Pawn Play" "Dynamic Pawn Play" "Pawn Power in Chess" "Pawn Structure Chess" and "Winning Chess Middlegames".

And doing this has been very instructive.  I am getting better.  And I have finally found the way I want to approach chess through Restriction Strategy, (the way Karpov and Petrosian play) and I have been compiling a lot of material on the subject, because there isn't really a lot on it, especially in one place, and I have found having a consistant strategy from move one really helps organize all of the principles of chess in your thoughts toward specific goals.

Thanks sen, as someone who's looking to take chess a little bit more seriously your post is really appreciated.

Not a Problem.  That's why I wrote it.

Sunship, if you have a little bit of money to spare do look for a coach and get involved in a local chess club. Reading books is fine and all. But with a teacher you will learn quicker and more to the point. Not the least because he can answer YOUR 1000 questions, something a book can never do.

Coaching can also be via Internet / Skype. Although in person is of course preferrable. I can recommend at least 2 good beginners coaches with very reasonable prices here on chess.com. Feel free to write me a private message if you like to know. Take care.

Senchean- tnx for all the obvious pain and effort you have laid down in writing this article.
One thing strikes me as somewhat weird- where is your computer in all this? It would be nice to hear what your reflections would be around how to use your computer effectively in order to learn chess faster combined
with your other advices 

Not everybody feels comfortable with computers and video lessons. It probably depends on the way each different brain can learn. There are many ways for learning and teaching. Software and audiovisuals like these  undoubtedly constitute a reinforcement to the learning process, but it is a matter of taste and personal choice.

Well, I use my computer for a lot of things to do with chess.  But bgianis is absolutely right that learning have everything to do with the brain, and individuals learn differently.  As i stated in the Prnciples of Learning, 3. Everyone learns differently based upon seeing, hearing and doing.  Those that learn primarily through seeing, video lessons work very well, so do going over gran master games.  For those who learn by hearing, the acutal comentary in the video lesson is almost more important than what's on screen.  Those that learn by doing must physically play games in order to absorb chess principles.  Now this is in a general sense.  The way these methods of learning manifest within each individual vary widely, and they aren't the same even from topic to topic.  I learn chess very differently then I learn Karate, for example.

I myself learn by hearing.  So I primary learn from books.  For me it is ideas and concepts that are the most important thing so I do VERY well with books that explain what is going on in a game and relate them to chess principles.  However, I do very poorly with books that are primarily analysis and variations.  And this effects how I use my computer.

First, there is Chess.com and everything it has to offer.  I use Chessgames.com which helps with going over games when I do read books.  I haven't gotten into computer analysis very heavily because I am still working at a more general level and trying to properly understand chess strategy.

But for Chess.com I primarily use Tactics Trainer, Video Lessons, Articles, Game Editor and Onine Chess.  I have used Chess Mentor only a little bit.  For tactics trainer I use Dan Heisman's advice from his Novic Nook Articles which can be found on his website here: http://danheisman.home.comcast.net/~danheisman/Articles/Articles.html

When studying tactics he suggests a book called "Chess Tactics for Students" by John A. Bain.  The book give the standard tactics motifs such as pin, fork etc. and Dan suggests memorizing them like you would your multiplication tables.  This way when you are playing over the board, you will recognize them much faster.  He says you should be able to find the answers to the basic motifs within 15 seconds.  So what I did was got on Tactics Trainer put it on its lowest rating setting (400-500) and just did them for a week, until I could solve 10 to 20 of them in a row without a mistake.  Then I moved the setting up by 100 points.  I go as far as i can, when I get stuck, lets say at 1200, I drop back down to the begining and start over; focusing on the rating level where I start to have trouble.  I've been doing this all year.  It really has helped my tactics.  I see them a lot easier now and I see my opponents much easier which is absolutely necessary for prophylaxis.

I play Online Chess, the one where you have one to three days to play a move so that I have plenty of time to choose my move and really analyze the position.  I based this on Andy Soltis' advice in Learning Chess Made Easy to play correspondence games.  Online Chess does this perfectly.

I use Game Editor to go over my games, or games that are in the books I read but I can't find on chessgames.com  And Articles i just read like I would a book.

Video Lessons are a little different.  I have watched many video lessons on chess.com and I follow specific authors such as GMs Milik Khachiyan, Ben Finegold, and IM Daniel Rensch.  IM Goletiani's two videos on how to stop your opponent's best moves were fantastic and really filled in some gaps on Restriction Strategy which is how I have chosen to approach chess. 

But when I go over a video I also take a lot of notes.  And this is the real heart of how I am personally learning chess.  Everytime I read I takes notes on my computer.  Then I go through the notes, and "reduce them".  Reducing is reading over the notes and eliminating any fluff or unneeded, or repeated information.  Then i go through them a third time and reorganize the notes so that they are arranged in a way I can better understand them.  For example, I will put every mention of a certain topic, such as the center or the queen, in one place.  This way I go over the information at least three to four times; reading the book, taking the notes, reducing them, and reorganizing them.  This provides Repetition which is so vital to learning.  I must have about 3-500 pages of notes on my computer so far and it's still growing.

This has especially worked for understanding the strategy of restriction which there is very little written on.  But I have compiled it all into one place and have about 9 pages of reduced notes on it, and god knows how many untouched notes.  I was also able to finally create a thought process to use when I play based upon the ideas of restriction strategy and the ideas of Critical Squares and Planning and Evaluation ideas by GM Khachiyan.

Lastly, I use my computer to find the books I wish to read, and search reviews from both readers and professionals, such as Chesscafe.com or Jeremy Silman and John Donaldson.

I hope this answers your question.  And I'm very glad the thread is finally starting to pick up some steam.  I hope everyone keeps up the discussion.

This thread's title should be:

"How to Unlearn Chess"....w/ the theme being don't study, don't memorize, & play to create first....win second.

Ok.  And that means what exactly?  And if you don't like it, how would you say someone should learn chess?

Mr. Senchean has dedicated his life to Chess. I sincerely hope he becomes a GM soon.

It is good that you take notes regarding restriction which is the theme you like. And when you will have taken more notes then you can write a few volumes about the subject and release the series to the public. Since there is not much material you can take advantage of it.

Dear Mr. Senchean.. I admire you and I would like to be a friend of yourselves.I will be blessed!

Well, actually thats the plan.  I do want to get to GM and eventually write some books on chess.  Because I feel chess, as a whole, is taught very poorly.  There are many reasons for this and one of them is just the shear complexity of the game.  But this is one reason why I am taking notes, is to right and teach.  Arul, send me a friend request.

Senchean, much obliged. I can only support arul_kumar on that if you
really strive for the GM title you surely seem to have a plan on how to
achieve it and you seem to have a natural ability to structure yourself.
Both these qualities are invaluable in achieving such an ambitious goal.

As for purely negative inputs in this thread..well haters gonna hate and
thats that. Well done so far and all the best :) 

Well, I have been inspired now that this post has been revitalized a bit.  So.  In the next couple of days I'm going to post a continuations of this thread.  Each new post will focus on one of the 5 or so principles of learning I wrote about here.  I have added a couple more priniciples since I wrote this so I may talk about them as well.  But I will talk about what they each mean, and how to use them better.  When it is up I will post here to let everyone know.