15687 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I am about 3% through the ChessMentor right now. I find it extremely helpful.Apologies if this thread already exists somewhere. I didn't find it.I want to see how much my rating improves by completing the entire thing.I have seen a few mentions of people who have done this. I would love to hear some experiences about how useful the process was. Also, how long it took? How much true retention did you get versus how much just sort of blended into your internal chess knowledge?Thanks!
I think, as with pretty much anything else, the amount you get out of ChessMentor, and hence how much it helps you in the future, depends greatly on how much effort you put into the lessons. Personally, I don't have much patience for most of the ones I've tried so far which is partly a lack of discipline on my part.Part of it, however, is I fundamentally disagree with the philosophy behind some of the lessons. I did some of the opening theory lessons, for example (before I realized just how overrated opening theory is for most amateurs) and frankly, I completely disagreed with the suggested lines in many of the lessons. I understand it's hard enough programming meaningful comments after every reasonable move in each lesson, never mind having to deal with branching variations that are equally as good as each solution move, but to me, that's the biggest drawback to ChessMentor. It's one dimensional learning. Either you learn it's way of treating a position or else. Real chess is, of course, far less rigid.As an example, I remember doing a lesson on the Two Knights Defense from white's perspective. While I don't remember the exact line it suggested (as I don't generally play 1.e4,e5 2.Nf3,Nc6 3.Bc4,Nf6 games as white), the lesson basically was attempting to steer the white player toward a known line that potentially gives black very strong attacking chances. Granted, the lesson was aimed at newer players and it's true that most newer players wouldn't know how to use that attacking initiative as black to their full advantage, but why mislead newer players into embracing known dangerous lines like that? All that does is cause problems for them in the future when they start playing against stronger, more knowing opposition.Bottom line is while I think it's some neat software, it's no substitute to feedback from a strong, knowledgeable player.
If chess players are so smart why they are not millionaires/billionaires?
by johnmusacha a few minutes ago
Vishy Anand claims to be able to see 70 moves ahead...
by oxoxvc a few minutes ago
YOU TUBE CHANEL Poverty in America:
by RonaldJosephCote a few minutes ago
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by Abhilash03 2 minutes ago
Time Control Changes?
by saisree 2 minutes ago
What's your Best Move to win this game?
by India_chess 6 minutes ago
Ratings Are Deceiving
by RonaldJosephCote 6 minutes ago
How good do you have to be to play the Sicilian
by SilentKnighte5 8 minutes ago
Europe Respects Chess More Than USA?
by IpswichMatt 11 minutes ago
Complaint about my comments on Tactical Trainer
by Annabella1 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!