9033 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I prefer the Petrov because I don't like the doubled pawns in the Berlin Defense.
However, which one is more objectively solid? Which one is harder to crack?
If playing non-GMs, there is no need to worry about anyone cracking anything.
At class player level, I'd say neither and put my bets on the Caro-Kann. White has a lot of interesting attacking tries against the Petroff (my favourite being 5.Nc3!?) and it requires deep understanding to play the Berlin Wall with Black.
At GM level, I'll take the Berlin, for the simple reason that even Kasparov was unable to crack it.
The Berlin Wall is probably not good for anyone rated under 2500, and it may not even be good for anyone rated under 2650. When Vladimir Kramnik trotted it out against Kasparov in 2000, the shock was that Kasparov couldn't break it.
There are some excellent analyses of the Berlin Wall, but the brilliant idea behind the Berlin is simply that the endgames are incredibly difficult to play well.
The Petroff is an excellent opening for anyone up to 2500, and perhaps all the way up to 2900! The Russian Defense is not at all drawish except among chess professionals, and even then players such as Vishy Anand can play for the win as White.
So clearly, the Russian Defense should be preferred over the Berlin Defense for anyone not named Kramnik.
If I remember correctly, Kasparov hasn't faced Kramnik's Petroff. Maybe Kasparov might have difficulty with the Petroff as well.
According to chessgames.com, Kramnik has used the Petroff 102 times compared to 47 times with the Berlin Defense. Both the Petroff and Berlin Defense are called "drawing weapons". Since Kramnik prefer the Petroff more, does that mean the Petroff is more solid?
Kasparov cracked Kramnik's Berlin Defense:
Though the berlin defence does end in a draw often enough I would not call it a drawing weapon.
Right from the opening black creates inbalance (bishop pair vs pawn structure and kingside majority // position of the kings etc). These inbalances give black something to play for and if white makes a mistake capitalize upon. It is not for no reason that a player like Aronian says he plays the Berlin if he wants to win.
These inbalances are amplified at amateur level because we are weaker with the several advantages each side has. It is very easy to exchange the wrong pieces and end up lost and this goes for either side !
Concerned about trolling, again
by goldendog a few minutes ago
Our Prophylactic Move to keep kohai @ Chess.com little longer !
by bulletheadbilly a few minutes ago
18 Queens and two Knights
by koroloi a few minutes ago
Is it possible that there are psychic chess masters
by reflectivist 2 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by royalbishop 3 minutes ago
1-0 or 1/2-1/2
by Remellion 3 minutes ago
Combinational chess puzzles
by vomatharv 5 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by SmyslovFan 7 minutes ago
Bought:Fischer's "My 60 Memorable Games"
by DENVERHIGH 8 minutes ago
by jac1yn 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com