It's versatile, and can lead to either open or closed games, though white doesn't always get to decide this...so it's an opening where YOU need to be versaitle.
It can be its own opening system (as with Kosten's excellent "Dynamic English"), or can be used as a transpositional weapon.
A lot of GM's use it that second way to get into good 1.d4 positions, while avoiding some of black's more annoying defenses. It's pretty effective for avoiding the Grunfeld, for example (which usually gets forced into KID lines). And the Slav (which usually becomes a Caro-Kann).
The flip side to that is that it opens up a whole branch of theory you can't avoid when black plays 1...e5.
any 1 expalain the idea behind c4 opening. its pros and cons .. does it leads to closed or open game .... does it lead to tactical or positional games ... some books on c4 opening and some main variations