13278 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
As white, I would probably never considered Nxe4. d5 or even f3 looks interesting instead
I hope you mean 4. d5 followed by f3. Since 4. f3? is met with 4...cxd4 when you are a pawn down for nothing.
I hardly find this a simple solution to whites problems though. Making a pawnsacrifice where it's unclear if you have enough compensation.
Yeah, guess it's wise to toss in d5 first ;)
Didn't you do some nice analysis in another Veresov thread? Was it on the c5 move?
I've posted a lot of stuff about the veresov on this site before. Unfortunately I don't remember the threads I posted analysis on.
I did actually make a thread myself, specifically about 2...c5 two years ago. However there I just asked how to deal with it in public, not really providing much analysis, rather just example lines to demonstrate points.
In the end of the thread I thought 4. Bb5+ would be a decent solution to whites problems, with the idea to meet 4...Bd7 with 5. dxc5. Later I discovered that 4. Bb5+ Nc6 5. d5 a6 is still rather annoying for white.
What I don't get is that if you're going to end up playing a bunch of French Defenses and you aren't willing or interested in playing the best 1.d4 stuff, why not just play 1.e4 and at least get in some "fun" open & semi-open games?
There is no good way around learning good stuff. If you avoid the main lines of either d4 or e4, you aren't doing yourself any favors.
I often recommended playing the veresov to my students which have been playing 1...e4 previously.
The point being that it's good to have a secondary opening to turn to if you are for example facing an expert in the sicilian. The veresov is nice in the way that you can learn it very quickly. It also provides more unbalanced positions compared to other system openings and doesn't give black as many options due to the forcing nature of 2. Nc3.
by X_PLAYER_J_X a few minutes ago
My road from 1200 to 2100 in less than 2 years
by CrimeZone a few minutes ago
Frustration with Turn-Based Games
by Martin_Stahl 5 minutes ago
When your opponent fails to respect your strong center
by -waller- 10 minutes ago
Positional Play: What is it, really? Show us an example
by PaulEChess 10 minutes ago
Players the wrong rating
by DamonevicSmithlov 10 minutes ago
i feel bad for both UK and America chess
by X_PLAYER_J_X 11 minutes ago
What do you say one move from mating your opponent!
by alessandropicone 15 minutes ago
5/27/2015 - Condemned
by KillTheHorsie 18 minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by Kman413 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!