I think the KIA is a bad idea for a number of reasons:
1) It leads to the same position again and again and again and again. You will start playing moves out of habit instead of out of thought. Black alters something slightly, you make your habitual moves, you die! I speak from experience, playing the KIA via 1.Nf3 for 8 months back in 1997.
2) There are certain lines it's not very good against. The best case if when Black plays a French (i.e. 1.e4 e6 2.d3 d5 3.Nd2 c5 4.Ngf3 Nc6 5.g3 Nf6 6.Bg2 Be7 7.O-O O-O etc.), but even then, Black gets a good game as long as he knows how to defend the immediate attack on the King.
If you are going to play 1.Nf3, I would recommend following up with 2.c4 against 1...d5 (Reti), either 2.c4 (English) or 2.e4 (Sicilian) against 1...c5, and 2.c4 with an eventual d4 against 1...c6 or 1...e6, going into QGD/Slav lines.
Hey all, I'm thinking about playing 1.Nf3 . I usually play d4 and go for a Colle Zukertort (which I love) but I feel like I have outgrown it. I also play the French and QGD (but possibly going to learn KID) if anyones interested.. So I'm thinking of starting a KIA based repertoire but I would like to know whether people think playing the KIA attack is a good idea and also when not to play the KIA and transpose into different lines that give me an advantage.
Any comments are appreciated