Resource Chess Suggestion
Sort:
[COMMENT DELETED]
Jan 5, 2016
0
#2
@acterhd
I think that you should:
1. come up with an idea for a game
2. make a board and set
3. play it for several months (or years) with friends until you get it right
4. then create a post about it on this forum
It just seems to me that you spam a lot (one a day) of posts each about a new idea in broken english.
I think that if you are trying to learn english then this is probably not the right place to do it as most people will not respond to your posts as they will have difficulty in interpretating your meaning.
Regards
Warlord
[COMMENT DELETED]
final_wars wrote:
@acterhd
I think that you should:
1. come up with an idea for a game
2. make a board and set
3. play it for several months (or years) with friends until you get it right
4. then create a post about it on this forum
It just seems to me that you spam a lot (one a day) of posts each about a new idea in broken english.
I think that if you are trying to learn english then this is probably not the right place to do it as most people will not respond to your posts as they will have difficulty in interpretating your meaning.
Regards
Warlord
You don't seem to understand the purpose of a forum. It is supposed to be a place where people exchange ideas, so that they can all contribute on improving the idea. Not a collection of advertizements for finished products, where every comment should be taken as an insult and put down by remarks like "I'd rather die than fix it", "I will ignore that" or "I don't need your advice"...
Chess is perfect. Don't change a thing.
Actually orthodox Chess is a relatively boring game to watch, with a high draw rate, that has been analyzed to death. But it definitely has its strong points too.
Jan 5, 2016
0
#7
@HGMuller
I notice that you almost always press quote before you type your remark.
I notice that you almost always respond no matter what I say.
Do you have something to prove?
You remind me of the staff at the big banks with their chained emails.
I asked a senior manager once why they do that, his response was:
"To cover their arses so they can blame someone else."
My response was: "I would rather just get shat on, I am too busy geting it done."
The only reason why I typed my comment was that he has been spamming a lot recently. An idea (variant?) or more a day for the past 2 weeks.
I long ago figured out that you consider yourself the resident "expert" in variants. really?
Go ahead man, that is your insignificant little domain if you want it.
Me, I stopped looking at variants more than 2 years ago.
Why? Because I completed my game.
Regards
Warlord
Final Wars
I consider it a good habit to quote what I am reacting to if it was not the immediately preceding posting.
As to the serial posting: the posting rate on this forum section is in general so large that this seems a problem other than to the extremely intolerant. If it was it is the task of the forum moderators to correct that.
Consider me the "avenger of evil".
If I see statements that beg correction, I will provide it.
That you think your game is the ultimate achievement of humanity making the rest of world economy redundant can hardly have escaped anyone.
[COMMENT DELETED]
Jan 5, 2016
0
#10
acterhd wrote:
I had few failure ideas, that I wanted to fix... All ideas based on previous.
This idea - Resources - continue of Custom Chess. I just suggested real interpretation of idea.
I have:
- Custom Chess (now Resources chess)
- Black Chess (now version 2)
And yes, I don't know English! If you suggest to me war, then okay...
@HGMuller
Please respond to this.
Many thanks.
Warlord
[COMMENT DELETED]
It would in general be better to post corrections on previous ideas in the same thread as where those previous ideas were posted. It would draw fewer aggressive replies from the intolerant that just distract from the subject.
The idea in itself is not bad. However, look for instance at Ralph Betza's Buypoint Chess.
