No this was a rather poor game, is there any reason you ignored my comments and started a second thread? It did not make 11...Nd6+?? or 17...Bd7?? go away.
Analyze this game please
Sort:
aggressivesociopath wrote:
No this was a rather poor game, is there any reason you ignored my comments and started a second thread? It did not make 11...Nd6+?? or 17...Bd7?? go away.
That is false. I made some errors on my first thread so I deleted it made a new thread to fit the likings. Sorry for the inconvienience
Had your opponent played 8.0-0-0 then not ideal for black is it? Not a great-game and if you particularly like to have games analysed then could consider taking a paid-subscription which would provide ''computer-anlalysis'' as a feature.
[COMMENT DELETED]
Don't pay money for computer analysis. I suggest trying to annotate the game yourself with variations that make sense before posting. Look for basic tactical mistakes, you and your opponents will probably hang at least a piece per game. You simply have to increase you tactical vision to the point where this does not happen before you can improve.
7. ..Bc5 and then Ne7
it was a good game,
give me more, I will analyze them.
Game analysis. He blundered a piece. Then you blundered one back. Then he allowed you to get 2 rooks on the 2nd rank and you won. Not much else to consider lol.
[COMMENT DELETED]
Was this is a good game? Is there anything I could of done better?
BTW I'm black