11343 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So yeah, broke my losing streak (even though I mostly played e4 in those games too). I think I'm still getting the hang of this particular opening and its variations (though I couldn't put a name to any of them). So I'll just ask for the usual critique and review, something I always find helpful
Mmm I agree... your advice has been well noted! I've noticed a tendency in myself to postpone taking pieces to guard against infeasible (is that a word?) threats. It's time I stopped that.
For your rating, that was pretty good
Well, that is a legitimate tactic in some cases. Called an intermezzo or zwischenzug where you can simply insert a move before the obvious to gain an advantage. In others (like this), you simply fail to take advantage of winning a piece and the chance disappears.
I'm a Petroff player, 4.Bd3 and 5.c3 is fine, that's book theory.
Although fine doesn't mean it's the best, 4.Nc3 is definitely what I would choose since it follows one of the general rules of the openings: develop knights before bishops.
7.Bc2 is a bad move, once again, because it doesn't follow the opening rule: don't move your piece twice in the opening.
9.Ba4, even if the knight wasn't hanging was also a bad move, 1. because it doesn't follow the mentioned rule, 2. because your pieces are disconnected and your attack doesn't look to have any plan. You generally want to pressure a chosen place and positionally or tactically gain advantage on one or two squares and when you have it, attack.
"Reykjavik Open, Round 6 | Commentary by FM Ingvar Johannesson & Fiona Steil-Antoni"
Games against this kind of Alekhine defense
by konhidras a few minutes ago
Is this position legal?
by DefinitelyNotGM 2 minutes ago
3/8/2014 - Endgame Fundamentals
by ningyuan 3 minutes ago
by DrSpudnik 5 minutes ago
How to deal with opponent's knights??
by mattbk 8 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by rooperi 23 minutes ago
PairFX: a free new chess program for running scholar tournaments
by orangeishblue 23 minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by Itude 30 minutes ago
Affordable coach. Anyone?
by pHUMpK1Ns 31 minutes ago
by caveatcanis 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!