if you have the time to laugh, that means you have time to spare to actually learn to play better.
Does this game make you laugh?

So I win by checkmate, and I need to play better? Okay sir! - I must learn how to beat winning. Lol yeah right. Heh.

I didn't like your Bishop check on the 7th move, for the reason why the move your opponent played...now you need to move the same piece twice in the opening.
I like how your opponent allowed you to straighten out your doubled Pawns, THEN he allowed you to control the center EVEN MORE with your 11th move!! He was so nice for doing that, makes me feel good that people are friendly like that!! He should have taken the Pawn as opposed to Castling. You took advantage of the Center and he didn't mind at all. Nicely done, mi'lord.
Your opponent made dumb-dumb with ...f6. I didn't like that move at all. Perhaps he could have unpinned the Knight by moving the Rook to King 1 first. You took advantage of his weakened light squares. I liked how you punished him by taking with the center Pawn. Very good!
He played Rook takes Pawn, then you got your Queen in line for an Escalator Mate...and access granted!
Nevertheless, I'm glad you enjoyed the game, sire.

There were several bad moves in this game. Fortunately for OP, most of them were done by his opponent. At first I was going to knock him for pushing d5 on the fifth move, but I favored it when I doubled checked that his Queen Knight has been traded off.

Some better moves:
3. Nd5 to counterattack the attacking bishop.
11...dxc4, which wins a pawn.
I agree with the second one, but isn't White's Queen Knight pinned at that moment...or were you just trolling. lolz...
EDIT: Oh no...never mind. I looked at the board again. My bad.

So I win by checkmate, and I need to play better? Okay sir! - I must learn how to beat winning. Lol yeah right. Heh.
As Gary Kasparov said "as we're winning our opponents are studying their losses. If we do not try to find inaccuracies in the games we win to improve, they will catch us up." Something like that, I cant remember the exact wording. So in short, even though you won. Yes, you do need to improve.

There were several bad moves in this game. Fortunately for OP, most of them were done by his opponent. At first I was going to knock him for pushing d5 on the fifth move, but I favored it when I doubled checked that his Queen Knight has been traded off.
Heh.

So I win by checkmate, and I need to play better? Okay sir! - I must learn how to beat winning. Lol yeah right. Heh.
As Gary Kasparov said "as we're winning our opponents are studying their losses. If we do not try to find inaccuracies in the games we win to improve, they will catch us up." Something like that, I cant remember the exact wording. So in short, even though you won. Yes, you do need to improve.
Obviously I'm not Houdini yet.

Interesting, but not really funny. 16...Rf7 was black's downfall. Almost anything else would have enabled counterplay.

Interesting, but not really funny. 16...Rf7 was black's downfall. Almost anything else would have enabled counterplay.
Even before that, f6 was just absolutely terrible. He didn't need to have played it. Now if White down the road had something on the board like e6 threatening P x N then P x P would be understandable threatening R x Q, and sadly Black would have an isolated center Pawn and a weak Kingside to worry about.
Like I said before Black made too many mistakes and OP punished him for it.

Why would you brag about this game? You didn't make any great moves. All you did was capitalize on your opponent's bad ones. This is the equivalent of Mike Tyson bragging because he beat me in a boxing match. Learn some respect. First for yourself and then for your opponent. And then when you manage a legitimate win, you can come back and brag. And should that ever happen, you'll still sound like a pompous brat.

Actually...Khas here has a very good point. I think it's better than to post your LOSSES and point out bad moves and ctitique yourself than to boast about something like this.
I am playing the OP in a game now...and I made a terrible blunder, causing him to win the game. Even though he didn't trash talk me, I wonder if he will post THAT game...hhhhmmmmm...

Until move ten a very good game by white. He has the bishops and space advantage. Blacks bb4-bxc3 idea is bad. 11.c4 is a mistake as black can just take that pawn. 11. Ne1 followed by f4-f5 looks good.
15.exf6 is probably also not best move as black can take with knight on f6 when h7 is protected. Better is 15. Qe4, leaving kingside pawn majority intact.

Well, here's a game that REALLY WILL make you laugh!
Let me first give you the run-down. I was winning, then I blundered away my last Rook, causing him to win the game. LightYearz was OK with me playing it out, so I just perpetual checked him, seeing if I could swindle him somehow. He manages to use his King to pick off all my Pawns. Then he plays a Knight move to stop the Queen checks...then I resigned in the then COMPLETELY HOPELESS position. I feel that he was respectful in that game.
Well anyway, feel free to comment and troll at will:
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=103612824
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1027018276
I like this game - what about you?