Okay fair enough, I forgot about the pawn in that line. Also, I know full well that White can do kingside attacks in the Stonewall. I realize this idea, and I use this idea. I've had these attacks succeed, and I've had these attacks fail depending on how my opponent defends. To illustrate how I view the Stonewall as an attacking weapon, I present this more recent blitz game.
True, I didn't probably play the best moves, but I do understand how the Stonewall can be used for attack. My point though, is that with accurate play from both sides, a Stonewall game becomes more of a positional struggle than a hack 'n' slash game. Basically, I was confident in my ability to resist White's efforts on the kingside while pursuing my own designs on the queenside. For whatever reason, my friend deemed it pointless to try for a kingside attack and so I was unable to test my theory.
Anyway, I just think that White's getting a little too much credit here. Black's got some things in his own hand of cards. You just have to look for them.
-----------------------------
Chesscom is bugging again..Anyways, I thought maybe black had chances on the queenside(such as the exchange of bishops idea).
But, from your notes you sounded like u were just going to plant your knight on e4 and wait for white to attack you. Like I said just thought your maneuver helped white do what they wanted.
Maybe it wasn't such a bad idea after the exchange of light squared bishops though. Maybe you could even bat off the attack. But, the way you were talking in your notes made it sound like you were playing for a draw or loss (while having to bat off what looks like a pretty good-even positionally sound, attack). Personally I don't like fighting for a draw with no chances of winning. the knight on e4(what was it 4 moves to get there-with one of them accelerating whites attack). Once you get the knight there it is attacking c3...But, a long way from really putting any pressure on it.
Unfortunately I can't show a diagram...But after ne7..maybe just k-h1 for white and then if n-g4 g4 and f5(yes I will sac the exchange again if u exchange with both minor pieces on f5 and then play n-f3. have I mentioned I am a hack lol. Although, my instincts tell me there is no way black can come out of this equal. If you take with the knight first and then the pawn. Well I think you can see the comp for the pawn )
If you don't take. Well, maybe u are trying to still get the knight to e4 but it seems the attack is coming(many different lines which I wish I could post). f6 (after q-h4 if the black light square bishop isn't pinning it) turns out to be deadly(after an exchange of 2 minors on e4).
I have one more ;) Want deep analyze! :)