17299 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Missed a mate in 2 but saw a mate in 5 - both ultimately checkmate, however the chess.com computer analysis deems this a mistake. Does anyone like me think that's illogical in principal. I understand that chess is fundamentally all about being efficient, therefore I would consider that to be an innacuracy. I am probably missing the point so please don't lambast me for this thought.
Amazing grand prix attack. Down material but not losing. Tal was my inspiration.
by tyfletch 3 minutes ago
Add Me!! New Chess Profile
by StevenFischborn 11 minutes ago
7/2/2015 - Mate in 5
by leewebb97 13 minutes ago
1000 Worst Things To Do While Playing Chess
by KingJames4914 16 minutes ago
NPAPI plugins (eg Flash) will shortly not work on Google Chrome
by eehc 19 minutes ago
When a coward refuses to resign.......
by alex-rodriguez 20 minutes ago
The "Game abandoned" system makes no sense
by GreenCastleBlock 24 minutes ago
How its possible?
by TurboFish 24 minutes ago
by Samantha212 31 minutes ago
Chess.com users should be REQUIRED to use REAL NAMES.
by halfgreek1963 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!