Forums

On my way up

Sort:
ofircohen_16

I've beaten a 1566 player with the black pieces. I feel like I'm on the way up. I now draw and mate high rated opponents like this one as much as I lose to them, and 1400's are no longer a problem for me. I only got into chess two months ago and if I get to 1600 soon, that's gonna be awesome.

Here's the game:

 

 
ParkerWeston

It says you have been a member since september 20, 2014,  which would be around six months ago. Your first standard game was on October 10, 2014 and from your first standard game you haven't gone below a 1500.  Honestly i find it hard to believe that someone "new' to chess could have started and maintained a 1500+. 

ofircohen_16
ParkerWeston wrote:

It says you have been a member since september 20, 2014,  which would be around six months ago. Your first standard game was on October 10, 2014 and from your first standard game you haven't gone below a 1500.  Honestly i find it hard to believe that someone "new' to chess could have started and maintained a 1500+. 

What are you trying to be? A detective? Chill out dude, I've got no reason to lie to anyone.

ParkerWeston

No i just dont like the fact that you lie, when really you probably have been playing for around 7-8 months. If you didnt have a reason why did you?

ParkerWeston

I "honestly" started at the end of december of 2014, which makes me playing around 4/4.5 months.

MyNameIsAdis

He is a lier. He was playing chess before just like most of us.

TitanCG

I think 10...Nf4 loses a pawn because White can play 14.O-O and get away. 

Instead another idea is 10...f5 11.g5 Nf4 with the difference that White has been provoked into overextending on g5.

12.Nxf4 Bxc4 13.dc ef 14.Bxf4 Bxg5 looks pretty good and 12.Bxe6+ Nxe6 is also good.

ParkerWeston

I didnt play any "actual" chess before the website.  I barley knew how the pieces moves

chesstorian72

ParkerWeston wrote:

I didnt play any "actual" chess before the website.  I barley knew how the pieces moves

Im guessing ofircohen_16 has two accounts and parkerweston is ofircohen_16 and made a mistake when trying to argue with himself by using the other fake account that was supposed to be questioning his claims and the comment above was supposed to be said by ofircohen_16 account not parkerweston. Illuminati confirmed.

chesstorian72

Also the ofircohen_16 account had a forum called I suck at chess where he is saying he wants to quit because he thinks he sucks. So two possible scenarios 1. Hes really wants to become a grandmaster so bad but his mind is telling him other wise and is looking for support by making false claims and accounts. The second thing is hes just trolling if you don't believe me then look at the exchange between ofircohen_16 and parkerweston which is his other account.

ParkerWeston
chesstorian72 wrote:

Also the ofircohen_16 account had a forum called I suck at chess where he is saying he wants to quit because he thinks he sucks. So two possible scenarios 1. Hes really wants to become a grandmaster so bad but his mind is telling him other wise and is looking for support by making false claims and accounts. The second thing is hes just trolling if you don't believe me then look at the exchange between ofircohen_16 and parkerweston which is his other account.

Ha!! thats a  really stupid claim, because first of all ofircohen is around 300 points higher then me.  Do you think im trying to play bad on this one? And with my quote "I didn't play any "actual" chess before the website.  I barley knew how the pieces moved." I was giving him an example of honesty.

chesstorian72

ParkerWeston wrote:

chesstorian72 wrote:

Also the ofircohen_16 account had a forum called I suck at chess where he is saying he wants to quit because he thinks he sucks. So two possible scenarios 1. Hes really wants to become a grandmaster so bad but his mind is telling him other wise and is looking for support by making false claims and accounts. The second thing is hes just trolling if you don't believe me then look at the exchange between ofircohen_16 and parkerweston which is his other account.

Ha!! thats a  really stupid claim, because first of all ofircohen is around 300 points higher then me.  Do you think im trying to play bad on this one? And with my quote "I didn't play any "actual" chess before the website.  I barley knew how the pieces moved." I was giving him an example of honesty.

Bahahahaha dude stop trying to cover it up you have two accounts and you are ofircohen . You made a mistake by not switching accounts. And if you were saying that as an example you would have said it was an example cause how the hell else would he even know it was an example without saying it was BAM!! BUSTED! PARKERWESTON IS OFIRCOHEN

ParkerWeston

....I really dont understand why you would think i would argue with my self on a forum.  That's just stupid. Who does that? I wouldnt suck on one account and do good on another anyway.  I think you are ofircohen, trying to troll on me fool.  Get a life and stop trolling with two accounts dude...

chesstorian72

Lol dont try to flip it around dude. Explain why you didnt say it was an example after your supposed examples idiot. Damn patzer

ofircohen_16

What's your fricking problem dudes.

ParkerWeston, I get it, you are embarrased about a begginer playing way better than you, so you call me a lier and a dishonest person for absolutely no reason. I will repeat myself: I am a begginer, I am new to chess. My rating is higher than yours, I know. Don't get so jealous. Maybe I'm just a bright guy, right? Accept as a fact that some people play better than others. Yes, a begginer can be 1500 rated, it's a low rating, I'd get my ass kicked by a 1650+ guy. Work on your chess and stop being so bitter about your lack of chess understanding.

I'd like future viewers to comment on the game, and not on their courtroom evidence for this meaningless trial you guys made of this thread. Isn't it supposed to be a chess website here?

chesstorian72

ofircohen_16 wrote:

What's your fricking problem dudes.ParkerWeston, I get it, you are embarrased about a begginer playing way better than you, so you call me a lier and a dishonest person for absolutely no reason. I will repeat myself: I am a begginer, I am new to chess. My rating is higher than yours, I know. Don't get so jealous. Maybe I'm just a bright guy, right? Accept as a fact that some people play better than others. Yes, a begginer can be 1500 rated, it's a low rating, I'd get my ass kicked by a 1650+ guy. Work on your chess and stop being so bitter about your lack of chess understanding.I'd like future viewers to comment on the game, and not on their courtroom evidence for this meaningless trial you guys made of this thread. Isn't it supposed to be a chess website here?

Ok yeah your not parkerweston but if you really have been playing for four months and are rated 1500 than you may have great potential. I know I wasnt that good that quick I dont even think im that good now.