12826 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Ok I'm sure there were many refutations to this sacrifice. But this is probably the first time I have found something like this, and considering my opponent was in time trouble it was probably best. What are your esteemed thoughts?
That was pretty nice. My only complaint with the sac was that there wasn't really any imperative for black to capture the rook on f6 immediately, or react to it at all. The rook on f6 looks dangerous, but wasn't threatening anything. Black should have taken the time to organize a defence or an escape route for his king, after which the idea of capturing white's f6 rook with the g pawn would actually become a serious threat for white, forcing him to move the rook once again.
Moreover, black should have taken the bishop after 20.Bxh6 with 20.gxh6. If white responds 21.Qxh6, black can respond 21.Qb6+ then 22.nxd5, which allows the black queen to help defend the vulnerable king (or the queens would be traded off, which would benefit the defender). In the end, black would have been able to recoverfrom the material deficit he suffered from the opening, though his position still looks worse.
I agree with everything you said, Kens_Mom. 23.Rf6 is undoubtedly objectively bad. But at this level one can almost guarantee it will be taken, and as far as I saw during the game this leads to a forced mate.I feel like it was some kind of major chess insight improvement to have spotted all this lol. But rest assured I would hesitate to play it against stronger opposition (although in fairness to my opponent, he was low on time.)
Do you have any thoughts on what would have actually been the most accurate 23rd move?
Maybe Rf2. The g1a7 diagnal can be used for some unexpected queen checks, so clog it up with the rook while moving it out of the attack of the e3 knight. The idea is that since you're already a piece up in material, the safest way to secure the win would be to prevent any counterplay. I can't tell if there is a better 23rd move that offers a faster win, but that would be how I would play in that situation.
Also, I apologize if I made it sound as though there was anything terrible about the rook sac. It sets up a nice trap using a piece that you were going to move regardless because it was under attack. Furthermore, you weren't taking unneccesary risks with the sac since accepting it would allow white to mate. Especially under livechess time controls, banking on such traps to work is not necessarily a bad way to play. There were definitely flaws made in the game, but I don't feel that 23.Rf6 was one of them.
7/25/2014 - Sahovic - Karolyi 1986
by tanmay_chakrabarti a few minutes ago
New Forum Rules
by hicks83 8 minutes ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by Irontiger 9 minutes ago
Only a 40 year break...
by A-J-S 12 minutes ago
by pfren 14 minutes ago
YOUR IQ compared to" World Chess Champion" Garry Kasparov ..
by petrosianpupil 23 minutes ago
Bumping Old Threads
by Ziggy_Zugzwang 33 minutes ago
kicked from livechess
by macer75 35 minutes ago
Friend is in prision
by macer75 39 minutes ago
Delete account or alter username
by zapped 40 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!