Hi,
I'm working on the same problem. It's a whole way of enjoying chess, no matter how much progress you make/don't make.
In my opinion, different things work for different people. But mostly, we can get unstuck by working on improving our worst problem. For most players below master level, it's usually tactics.
Try Micheal De La Maza's controversial book: Rapid Chess Improvement. His emphasis is on intense workouts with the ct-art program. I started this myself last year, and I am very impressed with it. I actually didn't know how bad my tactics skills were until I started this project.
To paraphrase De La Maza:
"What good does it do to memorize opening moves if we drop a piece a couple of moves later? What's the use of learning endings if we arrive there down a rook?"
For fastest improvement and getting "unstuck" I recommend these four steps:
1. After opponent moves, first determine the threat (ala Dan Heisman).
2. Use a "Blunder Check": before touching the piece to be moved, ask:
A) After I move, what checks will my opponent have?
B) After I move, what captures will my opponent have?
(Examine all)
3. Initiate an intense training program in tactics involving repetition of problem sets. "Rapid Chess Improvement" makes a case for a "Seven Circles Program". With that, you repeat the whole problem set 7 times. Sounds nutty, but.... it works!
It is impractical for many players to do 7 circles of 1200 problems, but I break them down into smaller groups to do it, and that works for me. The training method of repeating problem sets is not exclusive to "RCI" and "7-Circles". I saw the same kind of recommendation at Dan Heisman's website and at Chessville.
4. Going forward with improved tactics skill set, determine your greatest chess weakness and work on improving that. This is where a knowledgeable and experienced coach/teacher can help. He/She can help you identify what you should be working on.
I have intentionally left out a lot of stuff I know of that can help. (I'm sure other posters will notice that and fill in the gaps). The reason I did that is because starting out when you're stuck should (I think) be simple and easy to implement.
If you get unstuck and advance your skills, please get back to me and tell me what helped you most so I can try it too.
Good Luck
The discussion of how a beginner should start learning chess comes up fairly frequently and I found the advice very helpful. But now I seem to have hit a glass ceiling and I'm wondering how to go forward.
Here is where my game is:
Study: I've read Play Winning Chess, Winning Chess Tactics, and Winning Chess Endgames. "Endgames" was by far the most useful ... I often find I can win or draw games simply by knowing the principles of endgame play (without extensive calculation).
I've gone over games from Logical Chess: Move by Move. I often find when studying a game that I don't calculate very deeply so I've tried "pausing" at particular points and trying to calculate the players next move. This is especially rewarding in highly tactical games (Andersson, Morphy, Kasparov) where there is often an objective path to checkmate or winning material.
I've started How to Reassess Your Chess but it seems aimed at a more advanced audience.
Correspondence play: I play regularly here on chess.com - no more than a handful of game at a time. A few months ago my rating was 1777 - it's now dropped to 1432. This is largely, I think, because of the way I think about chess. When chess was "new" to me, I'd think about it all the time, even while away from the computer - I played better as a result of that. I now blunder frequently and lose a lot of games as a result of that. I go over each game and annotate it using ChessCat.
I've included a game where I blunder a couple of times as a "typical" example of my play - I had no business winning it but my opponent evidently didn't know much about endgames. This game isn't well annotated; I'm not really looking for comments just a general example of how I play.
OTB play: not much here. There's a local chess club but they mostly play blitz games, I don't get much out of it from an educational standpoint.
Problems and tactics: I do tactics trainer once every few days - just a few problems at a time. I also do the daily puzzles. My tactics rating is quite low, it generally fluctuates between 1100-1300 or so.
Internet play is great but it has it's limits - you don't meet people and you don't get to think about chess or focus on one game for a long time. What's the best way to prepare to become a tournament player? Which books would be the biggest help going forward? Should I take a lesson? Are timed games more useful than correspondence games?
Any advice is much appreciated!