Chess Axioms or Maxims

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post
10th June 2009, 12:10pm
#1
by e4forme
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2370

I find you have the Rules of Chess, such as 'how the pieces move' and 'Checkmate is the object of the game' and you have the Rules of Chess! This seem to be best found in the Chess Axioms or Maxims that you hear. I find I win a lot of games when my opponent Breaks a Chess Axiom or Rule and I simply look at how to take advantage of that.

Name a Chess Axiom that you consider a Chess Truth.

Knights before Bishops(when developing) is one.

Capture toward the Center(with pawns) is another.

10th June 2009, 12:13pm
#2
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

Chess and then beer, you're in the clear.

Beer and then chess?  Your game's a mess.

10th June 2009, 12:18pm
#3
by meniscus
United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1666

A drinking club with a chess problem.

10th June 2009, 12:19pm
#4
by e4forme
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2370

lol... ok, I am sure that is a universal truth alright!

10th June 2009, 12:21pm
#5
by rookandladder
Murfreesboro, Tennessee United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 476

Let's see...

Knights on the rim are dim...

Always attack in the direction your pawns are pointing...

Calculate twice, move once...

Develop the Queen last...

When you have a space advantage, avoid exchanges...

Rooks belong behind passed pawns...

10th June 2009, 12:25pm
#6
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

Hmmm, the only one of those I'd truly consider an axiom is "Calculate Twice, Move Once".  The rest have exceptions to the rule.

How about, always assume the best possible response from your opponent no matter who they are.

or

Play the position, not the opponent.

10th June 2009, 12:27pm
#7
by ACQ
Nine Mile Falls, WA United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 90

No one defends perfectly

-Silman

10th June 2009, 12:31pm
#8
by e4forme
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2370
TheGrobe wrote:

Hmmm, the only one of those I'd truly consider an axiom is "Calculate Twice, Move Once".  The rest have exceptions to the rule.

How about, always assume the best possible response from your opponent no matter who they are.

or

Play the position, not the opponent.


 I would consider all rookandladder's responses as Chess Axioms! Just because there is an exception doesn't mean it is not a rule or Axiom.

And those two are very good!

10th June 2009, 12:31pm
#9
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

A bad plan is better than no plan at all.

10th June 2009, 12:35pm
#10
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

No, I disagree -- an axiom is a self evident truth that requires no proof.  Because there are exceptions to the rule, I'd say that not only are they not self-evident, but that there are in fact counterexamples that constitute disproof.

"Guidelines" I'll buy.  "Axiom", though, is too strong a word for all but the third item.

10th June 2009, 12:38pm
#11
by kevinjin
Budapest Hungary
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 36

A far passed pawn in a king & pawn game will lead to victory

10th June 2009, 12:39pm
#12
by kevinjin
Budapest Hungary
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 36

open files are for queens and rooks----open diagnals are for bishops

10th June 2009, 12:40pm
#13
by itzdavey
Delaware United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 67

Agree with TheGrobe.  Even as a beginner I know that there are exceptions to the guidelines presented so far.   I think the only axioms in chess are probably the fundamental rules about how the pieces move. 

10th June 2009, 12:43pm
#14
by e4forme
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2370

ax·i·om Pronunciation: \ˈak-sē-əm\

Function: noun

Etymology: Latin axioma, from Greek axiōma,literally, something worthy, from axioun to think worthy, from axios worth, worthy; akin to Greek agein to weigh, drive Date: 15th century

...

1 : a maxim widely accepted on its intrinsic merit
2 : a statement accepted as true as the basis for argument or inference 
3 : an established rule or principle or a self-evident truth
.
2: a statement accepted as true as the basis for arguement or inference!
10th June 2009, 12:47pm
#15
by ACQ
Nine Mile Falls, WA United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 90

I think these are more along the lines of proverbs than axioms.

10th June 2009, 12:51pm
#16
by e4forme
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2370

A lot of Chess Truths and Insights are held in the Chess Axioms!

It would be a shame to ignore them just because there is an exception. To know the exception means you understand the purpose of the Maxim!

10th June 2009, 12:54pm
#17
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

See, now Maxim is a better word for some of these.  A general rule as opposed to an undeniable truth.

10th June 2009, 12:56pm
#18
by e4forme
Tennessee United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2370

I really just wanted to share some Insights...

Instead this thread is turning into an arguement over the Definition of Axiom, which I posted as well.

10th June 2009, 12:57pm
#19
by BlackWaive
Michigan United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 399
ACQ wrote:

I think these are more along the lines of proverbs than axioms.


Yes, it seems that way.

10th June 2009, 12:57pm
#20
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 4617

How about "Don't let pedantry get in the way of maintaining the focus of a thread"?

I have trouble with this one.

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.