16715 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
With the amount of positions, it might not be for quite some time.
That's why they built the Large Hadron Collider.
I only know that once I mastered 'the opposable feather', it was an end to all those 'touch move' blunders.
A good way to measure hardness is indeed to use the number of possible moves as a factor, how difficult it is for a computer to play it (computational complexity, using measures such as P, NP, etc.) and also how likely it is for a human to beat a computer.
These days, the best chess computers are far better than any human alive today, they have exceeded us in skill (>3000 ELO rating). In some (non-chess) games, the computer always wins, in other games, the human has a fair chance to mostly win. As far as computational complexity goes, I've heard that Go is by far the hardest.
So, Mr. DimebagdDerek, do either game help the other or are they so different there is no cross over? I assume it's like going from the piano to the kazoo, or vice versa.
No, I don't think the difference between chess and checkers is equal to the piano and the kazoo. No offense intended.
A useful measure of how hard, or perhaps a better word to use is challenging, a game is would be to look at the strength differential between good players and weak players.
Challenging games tend to have tactical and strategic subtlety (depth in other words) and strong players can exploit their superior knowledge and vision of these ideas. Equally, weaker players can gradually learn these ideas and improve.
So I would define a game as being hard if there is a broad range in standards of play. This would imply that games like chess and go and poker and maybe even scrabble are hard games.
Games like tic-tac-toe and snakes and ladders are not.
Chess is easy to play hard to master.
"trip-klee, klee-kleeklee ."
Go #1 chess #2
Chess is far more intricate and difficult to master. I picked up on how to play go relatively well in a short time. For me there is no comparison and no way chess is second. I'd pick tic tac toe before go, simply because it is so hard to win.
Go has many orders of magnitude more possible moves.
I owe you an apology. I was thinking reversi...
I cannot believe what I am reading.
Chess is as hard or as easy as the opponant you play.
There is absolutly no luck in chess if you were a grand master for example.
Luck in chess increases the lower down the rating system you are.
By that I mean that a game can develop in your favour or not 9 or 10 moves down the road.
I am at the bottom end of intermediate players so obviously there is a slight luck elemant in my games in terms of development.
Checkers is NO WAY more complex than chess as there are so much less possibilities
I just read the post about checkers,
I did not realise there were that many possibilities lol.
But still ,,, less than chess
Q: How hard is chess?
A: Very easy.
Oh wait... I missed the "really." --
A: Very hard.
I think chess is only as hard as your opponent makes it for you. Considering all of us play against total numpties [i.e. our equivalents] it isn't all that hard at all. Maybe what makes it appear so difficult is that we play to the best of our ability but on the other side of the board is someone of equal strength, playing at the best of his ability too but in the exact opposite direction. That is what makes chess a mind struggle.
The consequences of measuring "best" moves against what is "perfection" is a different case. Then your mind starts to bend.
Maybe the most difficult chess game is Shogi, since the taken pieces can re-enter the game. Also Xiangqi (chinese chess) is more difficult than chess.
Then if it is board games in general Weiqi (Go) is surely more difficult than chess.
Once they were selling these simulations of war battles, made with hexagon, different pieces to represent different units, for sure those were impossible as difficulty level, today I'm sure they have been converted on computers.
However, the most difficult of all are surely the Pentagon simulations, since with all that money, they can only bomb flat a place, but are never able to win a war. The population generally rebel of the new puppet tyrant they put in place, and so on. But I guess that is the most difficult board-game of all, because there are political considerations, as well as the weather to consider.
Chess can not even be compared to checker's,does anyone dissagree with that?Not even close
I haven't actually said anything about the OP, but I think it's hard to answer this question. The rules are very simple, and there are just 6 pieces. I think there are fewer rules to chess than monopoly, but it's the people who play it that make it so complex.
There is a game, I'm not sure of it's title, but it is all of World War 2. There are several maps that cover up the whole floor, players control production, alliances, troops, etc. and it has a very thick rule book. It probably takes months to play. I'd say that this game is much harder to grasp the basics.
A more well known series of games would be Warhammer. The rule book for this is a few hundred pages, and there are hundreds of different units. But, that's not really a board game.
Chess is an extremely simple game to learn. A willing student can pick up everything they need to know to play a legal game in a very short period of time.
But having a simple ruleset does not translate into being an easy game to play well. Go is a far simplier game, but is at least equally difficult to play well.
How Hard Is Chess, Really?
It is hard if you don't have the right perspective.
The right perspective consists of 3 elements:
1. Chess is Siege Warfare in the form of a board game.
2. There are 2 Chess Opening Theories (Classical and Hypermodern)
2. Pawn Structure
In combination the above 3 elements seem counterintuitive at first. After 3 months of practice your game will have improved dramatically. 2-3 years of practice and your playing strength will approach USCF 2000+.
If you would like to knaow more, please let me know.
According to Wikipedia, chess is the second most complicated board game in existence, next to Go, which is about 10,000 times more complicated.
The reason is probably because Go has a vaguer objective than that of chess, which is to control the most territory instead of assassinating a specific piece. Thus, there are more ways to win Go than there is to win chess.
"2015 European Individual Championship Round 9 Hosts GM Alon Greenfeld and GM Alik Gershon"
3/5/2015 - E.Stoddard vs S.Sorenson, corr., 1977
by Mouhamad_Khalaf 5 minutes ago
what tactic book help u get over that hump
by Justs99171 8 minutes ago
Query: players that employ cheap tactics
by polarization 13 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "Petrov Memorial (rapid) 2015"
by SJFG 14 minutes ago
3/4/2015 - Boxed In
by DA-NINJA-15 20 minutes ago
Are openings important? Recommendation
by clarapca 20 minutes ago
Ping Problem :(
by cool64chess 23 minutes ago
Gary Kasparov Arrested
by trysts 28 minutes ago
What's On Your Bookshelf?
by Ziryab 29 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by AlanDewey 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!