16525 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I disagree with the OP:I don't believe that chess.com needs to be deleted just because of a simple rule change. In fact, I believe that chess.com can be greatly enhanced by fixing up the game of Chess and taking punitive action against all these rule-exploiting should-be-losers.
no peter, he doesn't want you to delete chess.com, he wants you to delete your chess.com account. slight difference.
He is definitely sounded like monster_with_no_name.
I dont want other people to want people to not want people to delete their accounts, and I mean that.
you mean you want his account deleted? I think I followed it this time.
They do seem to have suffered similar head trauma, but monster was a bit more frantic, you could almost see the flecks of spittle flying from his mouth as he sat on the edge of his chair, typing with furious intensity.
I suspect peter is just a parody of monster. Whatever his intent, he certainly used the right bait.
could you please restate whatever you feel strongly about? the commas create many different possible meanings
Ok its probably better if I do it using abstract representative logic.
Let A = people who want to force other people to delete their account.
Let X = people who propose rule changes including rule changes regarding closure of account
Let B = all other people who want accounts closed.
Let C = Everyone who does not want anyone to want to close people's account (regardless of whether the accounts actually get closed or not)
Let D = Everyone who does not want the accounts closed.
Let E = Anyone who does not want everyone to want to close the accounts of people who suggest accounts should always remain open.
Then, [A mod X = (B+E*(D-C))^2] * (B+C+(DQ*))
Q = the moving rating average of people who do not want players to want other players to close accounts.
I hope stating it in algebraic form clarifies things.
I don't see how it could be made clearer.
But is that ELO or glicko?
Or Gordon Gecko?
I think I need a drink.
So...that's what gg stands for.
Finally a suggestion I can agree with! Thanks OP
I am trying to keep it simple and you are needlessly complicating it.
I think its spelled Gordon Gekko.
You're right. Mr. Gecko is that green guy who does TV ads for Geico in the USA.
Perfect. ? I couldn't have said it better myself?
Welcome back...I thought you were giving chess up.
Maybe the clarity of my post made you realize chess helps prevent confusion.
"chess is clarity" - falcogrine
If you suggest changing the rules of chess, you should delete your chess.com account and create your own chess website.
if you have more than 5 posts supporting changing the rules for over 2 days, your account should be deleted.
lol good one
by Iluvsmetuna a few minutes ago
Carlsen's mammoth ivory set
by EvgeniyZh a few minutes ago
I beat Houdini using my arb system
by wanmokewan 2 minutes ago
by kaynight 2 minutes ago
by Mister-Horse 3 minutes ago
by Hopey546 4 minutes ago
does anand go down as the greatest player of all time
by pfren 4 minutes ago
sexism in chess?
by DomCJR 8 minutes ago
Adding weight to pieces
by Benzodiazepine 9 minutes ago
11/28/2014 - Inch By Inch
by 22kevin2007 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!