5996 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
marvellosity
Hi, don't know if this has been answered before, but taken from the 360 forum:
I am not sure if this has been posted before. But when you issue a Chess960 Challenge there seems to be a small bug.
I put in a rating parameter for the a Chess960 game. The default ranges provided by the interface are based on my Chess960 rating. Yet when the challenge was accepted the rating range is based on on my opponents online rating not his Chess960 rating.
Is this going to be sorted out? It's extremely annoying :/
FM Kacparov
Yes, I said it at least once, and many other people did it as well. But I've never seen anyone from the stuff say something about it.
aansel
Perhaps someone will answer this
corile
We deserve an answer!!
maybe if a few hundered people say that they'll answer, but they're certainly willing not to!
WanderingWinder
I'm not sure whether this is related at all, but there are a couple of seeks open for 960 games with DPG1232 (for instance http://www.chess.com/echess/view_game_seek.html?id=9548641). One of them has been up there for at least a week or so, the other has been put up in the last few days. I would like to accept them, but whenever I try to, I get an "Oops!? or server made a dubious move" screen that says that there was some problem and that they were working on the error and would hopefully have it solved within a couple days.
Bump, for admin attention...
Are admins wilfully rude or do they simply not read topics in the help and support section?
bump!
Bump until this gets answered, damnit
a humble BUMP!
cofail
Perhaps because many people have not played many 960 games, and a standard chess rating would be more accurate
That's not an answer.
yes it is
A completely bogus reasoning for using the wrong ratings is not an answer to "when will it work properly". Sorry.
Bump
~ Game 1: Anand vs. Gelfand - 2012 ~ Analysis ~
by RedBull1485 2 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by Coopah 3 minutes ago
Mate With 4 Knights!!
by LycanWerewolf 4 minutes ago
Multiple team membership
by RumbleTumble 12 minutes ago
MAJOR MALFUNTION WITH LAST GAME!!!
by fighterjet 27 minutes ago
When is the new Vote Chess game Opening Experts vs Endgame Experts starting??
by Aditya_Deshpande8 44 minutes ago
Asking people to resign
by chrisr2212 50 minutes ago
Fritz 12 and no internet
by gutartas 51 minutes ago
Use of a copmuter for advice!
by alexlaw 58 minutes ago
Reading messages from banned members
by MindWalk 60 minutes ago