Trial: the members of Chess.com v checkmateibeatu

Sort:
Ben_Dubuque

Hello all i would like to bring to order this event to regress the wrongs brought upon certain members of this wonderful site by checkmateibeatu so anyone willing to judge this event is welcome, just send a message and i will respond yes or no and state a reason

These are the charges against checkmateibeatu

1. false accusations of highjacking

2. not giving adaquet reasons for baning people from his groups

3. and refusing to give any statement even after preasured

4. skewing the results of polls

5. disrespecting other peoples votes and opinions

6. giving the impression of being a knowitall

7. being indecent in his manners

8. missuse of sarcasm

9. Taking up the bandwidth of 20 normal men.

thank you

1pawndown

"missuse of sarcasm" ... that's a capital offense is it not?

Ben_Dubuque

I know thats where i hope to get him big also on the false accusations of highjacking

Ben_Dubuque

1pawndown would make a fine jurer

Ben_Dubuque

sad that no one is willing to help defeat this fiend in a civilised manner oh and i remembered another charge to add

9. killing  oinquarki

PrawnEatsPrawn

10. Being a teenager.

Ben_Dubuque
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:

10. Being a teenager.


 dude then i would be guilty of that sorry but being a teen is not a crime sorry i realy am hey but the charge for skewing results is up to three counts

-waller-

As a teenager, I move to scratch charge 10.

Ben_Dubuque
-waller- wrote:

As a teenager, I move to scratch charge 10.


 already done my friend

here are the charges

1. false accusations of highjacking

2. not giving adaquet reasons for baning people from his groups

3. and refusing to give any statement even after preasured

4. skewing the results of polls

5. disrespecting other peoples votes and opinions

6. giving the impression of being a knowitall

7. being indecent in his manners

8. missuse of sarcasm

9. Killing oinquarki

PrawnEatsPrawn

Sounds like you're as guilty of point five, as he is.

goldendog

11. Taking up the bandwidth of 20 normal men.

bigpoison

12.  Not liking cookies. 

Ben_Dubuque
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:

Sounds like you're as guilty of point five, as he is.


 its not that i dont respect your opinion, but it is overly biased because i can say that we would have most of the members of my age group under threat of punitive action by other older more believable members of Chess.com

Ben_Dubuque

also if you wish to be a jurer say so and i will reveiw the members and deem them worthy or unworthy and give a reason as to why

bigpoison

Older does not equal more believalbe, especially when crustaceons are involved.

Ben_Dubuque
bigpoison wrote:

Older does not equal more believalbe, especially when crustaceons are involved.


 you have a point there but can you give proof to your acusation of the hienious crime of not likeing cookies

ps my favorite kind are white chocholate macadamia nut mmmmmmmmmmmm

cookies

PrawnEatsPrawn
bigpoison wrote:

Older does not equal more believalbe, especially when crustaceons are involved.


Especially when grown men can't spell for toffees.

Ben_Dubuque

well that is nice lets focus our attacks at checkmateibeatu though

Smile

PrawnEatsPrawn
PrawnEatsPrawn wrote:
bigpoison wrote:

Older does not equal more believalbe, especially when crustaceons are involved.


Especially when grown men can't spell for toffees.


 

p.s. Hurt: Cowboy

       Heal: The rest of the Village People.

 

bigpoison

A vowel's a vowel.  Why nitpick?