Actually this is a good point and not spam for once. Weird I've never encountered a non consecutive before, must be like a BNK v K with no pawns ending. C.c should probably find some code to fix/enable this
draw proposal needs to be improved

Well, i knew there will be a repetition because i know this pawn ending and how to force a draw using the opposition. Since my opponent wanted to continue ( probably he didn't know that there is no way for him to promote, or was hoping a mistake on my side) the repetition just happened.
I knew i could force it.
As fide rule 9.2 states:
I pressed the draw button both on move 67 and 70 ( 4th repetition) , but instead to get the draw, my opponent moved refusing the draw ( WTH?!?!?!?!? ). While i can imagine that it does not happens so often what people recognize a non consecutive treefold repetition i was very surprised that chess.com have not implemented this type of checks. For a portal that claim to be the best chess comunity, and a place where lots of title players play i think its fundamental stick with the rules, especially when its not hard to implement. How could be difficult save the FEN for each move and then compare the FENS uppon draw request?