Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

3rd Metropolitan FIDE Invitational

  • NM Gupta688
  • on Wed, 2/23/2011 8:16am.

Metropolitan Chess will host a International Master norm round robin tournament on February 23rd to 27th of 2011. The tournament is sponsored by California Market Center, Fashion Business, Inc, Chess.com, LawyerFy, and Betty Bottom Showroom.

sponsors3.jpg


Metropolitan Chess has a new website at www.metrochessla.com. Standings will be updated regularly at the website. A video recapping our last tournament can be found here.

This tournament will be held in Suite C998 of the California Market Center on 110 East 9th Street, Los Angeles 90079. The tournament is organized by Ankit Gupta, the chief arbiter is Randy Hough, and the deputy arbiter is Michael Belcher. The participants include: IM Zhanibek Amanov (KAZ), IM Timothy Taylor (USA), IM Jacek Stopa (POL), FM Alexandre Kretchetov, FM Joel Banawa, FM Michael Casella, FM Philip Wang, NM Konstantin Kavutskiy, NM Kayden Troff, and CM Giovanni Nieto Carreto. The FIDE average of the field is 2305, for a respectable category 4. Photos of some of the participants are shown below:

 

3rdmetinvit.jpg

Photo Credit: Christian Glawe


The tournament will be a 10 player round-robin (all play all), with rounds scheduled as follows – 23rd: 7:00 PM, 24th: 11:00 AM & 5:00 PM, 25th: 11:00 AM & 5:00 PM, 26th: 11:00 AM & 5:00 PM, 27th: 10:00 AM & 4:00 PM. Spectators are welcome and encouraged to come to watch the games in person at the tournament site. There will be two master commentary days live on-site. These commentaries will also be viewable on www.chess.com/tv

 Commentaries will be at 6:00 PM on February 26th and 5:00 PM on February 27th for the 7th and 9th rounds of the tournament, respectively. IM D. Pruess and NM A. Gupta will be commenting together for both of the commentary days. Local players/spectators are welcome to come to the tournament site to hear the commentaries live -- talk to the security in the lobby of the building to be directed to the proper room.

Stay tuned for more updates and watch the games relayed live on www.chess.com to find out the results.

6848 reads 33 comments
5 votes

Comments


  • 15 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    I thought so! 

  • 15 months ago

    IM dpruess

    you know me very well lawdogg so i know you know that i know that you know my answer. :-)

  • 15 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    David, just answer one question for me honestly. Are you happy with the quick draw and is it something you would like to see more of in the future, or do you consider it unfortunate and not something you would like to see in the future? It's a simple question and you can't have it both ways. 

  • 15 months ago

    IM dpruess

    what she means lawdogg is that if both players take minimum risks at various junctures (and are at a decently high level) the percentage chance of a draw can go into the high 90s. for example, a lot of GM games in the past have gone:

    d4 d5 c4 (solid choice by white) c6 (one of the more solid defenses for black, and maybe black also knows that white would be happy with a draw) cxd (white wants a draw) cxd... and then when the players have choices along the way, for example white's bishop is on f4 and black is choosing between Be7 (keeping pieces on) or Bd6 (trading) they will tend to make the Bd6 choice. this can make draws quite likely sometimes.

  • 15 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    No, qixel. You are too biased on this one. IM Rensch admitted that it was problematic.

  • 15 months ago

    qixel

    If both players go into a game needing a draw, wanting a draw, and playing for a draw, then guess what?  There's going to be a draw.

    There's nothing nefarious, illegal, or even weak about it.

  • 15 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    Thank you, Gupta, for being on top of it. Still sounds weak, agreeing to a quick draw, but at least it wasn't prearranged. 

  • 15 months ago

    NM Gupta688

    I told them both that we would be watching their game closely. I also closely watched the game, and they asked me, specifically if they could offer/accept the draw before it was taken while the game was in progress, and by our contract (required to play in our tournaments) due to the 20 moves made, we had no objections. The position they reached was fairly drawish as well.

    There was no pre-draw agreement as you seem to suggest. I was in the playing hall between the 8th and 9th round, and Banawa was reviewing on his computer between the 8th and 9th round, and Wang did not come into the playing hall until about 5 minutes before the 9th round, and did not know about Banawa's score until then in the 8th round.

    We had TD's watching the entire process of that game specifically in that round. All games are going to be submitted to TWIC, and you yourself can see that the resulting position of that game was very drawish.

  • 15 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    Wow! That's lame. I mean, I can sort of understand why they would do that. Neither one wanted to miss getting the norm. But, that doesn't make it right. Imagine if two football teams agreed to play to a 0-0 tie so that both of them could make the playoffs.

    Fans and reporters would never let them hear the end of the criticism. And there might even be legal or quasi-legal consequences. Maybe a Congressional hearing like with steroids. TV shows like Pardon The Interruption would denounce them constantly. 

  • 15 months ago

    RuralRob

    Death penalty for quick draws -- executions carried out during the closing ceremony. Problem solved, *and* a bigger TV audience.

  • 15 months ago

    IM ACEChess

    Yes Lawdog, they did. Unfortunate that they agreed to a quick draw, and not really something I would like to see in the future... but yeah, they both earned their IM Norms by taking the draw...

  • 15 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    Did Wang and Banawa draw each other in the last game to assure each other of getting the norms? 

  • 15 months ago

    qixel

    Congratulations to Jacek Stopa.

    And congrats to Philip and Joel on the IM norms !

    Love you guys <3

  • 15 months ago

    NM Gupta688

    FM Philip Xiao Wang and FM Joel Banawa achieved IM norms.

  • 15 months ago

    NM Gupta688

    Standings have been updated at: http://metrochessla.com/schedule.php

    Click on the red bar '3rd Metropolitan Chess FIDE Invitational'

    Norm contenders include FM Philip Xiao Wang and FM Joel Banawa at 6.0 out of 8.0. 1 round to go. 6.5 out of 9.0 is needed for the IM norm.

  • 15 months ago

    NM Gupta688

    Standings have been updated at: http://metrochessla.com/schedule.php

     

    Norm contenders include FM Philip Xiao Wang at 4.0 out of 5.0. FM Michael Casella, at 3.5 out of 5.0. FM Alexandre Kretchetov, and FM Joel Banawa are also in the running with 3.0 out of 5.0. 4 rounds to go. 6.5 out of 9.0 is needed for the IM norm.

  • 15 months ago

    NM Gupta688

    Standings have been updated at: http://metrochessla.com/schedule.php

     

    FM Michael Casella, FM Alexandre Kretchetov, and FM Joel Banawa are in the lead with 2.5 out of 3.0. 6.5 out of 9.0 is needed for the IM norm. Other norm contenders include FM Philip Xiao Wang at 2.0 out of 3.0.

  • 15 months ago

    NM ArunSh

    Are the round by round pairings listed anywhere?  I assume those were determined pre-tournament, but I don't see them on the website.

  • 15 months ago

    IM dpruess

    round 2 this morning will not have live relays of the games, but round 3 this evening (5 pm pac, 8 pm est) will have all games live from about 5:30 pm on (in live chess premium, go to the events tab, then click on the boards to observe).

  • 15 months ago

    mobidi

    Good news from USA!

Back to Top

Post your reply: