Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Book Openings

 
Flip board

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Comments:

by brownjamesbrown - 14 days ago
Maryland United States
Member Since: Jun 2011
Member Points: 6

One of my best ....

by sebs42 - 2 months ago
Karlsruhe Germany
Member Since: Aug 2011
Member Points: 206

The first occasion I played this was when I was seven years old and did not know that pawns may move two squares from their initial position. It was also the first chess game I ever played.

The second occasion has yet to come.

by artist - 3 months ago
vermont United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 39

I have played this before and won the game as well. it is very interesting opening

by rukja - 3 months ago
Portland United States
Member Since: Sep 2011
Member Points: 66

by rukja - 4 months ago
Portland United States
Member Since: Sep 2011
Member Points: 66
[COMMENT DELETED]
by psinha36 - 8 months ago
India India
Member Since: Mar 2011
Member Points: 38

it's the most basic opening and not so good for white.since white can control the middle board so playing so much defensive is surely not in favor for white.

by billwall - 10 months ago
Palm Bay, FL United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 3486

The opening is named after Maarten van 't Kruijs (1813-1885).  Sometimes his last name is spelled Kruys.  A lot of books write this opening as Van't Kruijs instead of the more correct van 't Kruijs (there is a space between the van and the 't).  He also seems to be the first person of note to play Larsen's opening (1.b3) as he did in Amsterdam in 1851 against de Heer.  Adolf Anderssen defeated van 't Kruijs in Amsterdam in 1861 with 5 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, but Anderssen still considered him one of the 10 best players he had ever played.  van 't Kruijs may have been the first person to play or invent what is known as Fischer Random chess, with the position of the pieces set up randomly.

by dylan2009 - 11 months ago
gresham ,oregon United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 124

well........in list of worse things ...starting from #5

5.death

4.death(cant think of another) :)

3.1,h4

2.war

1.this opening CoolUndecidedSurprisedYellEmbarassedKiss

by JJBooy - 11 months ago
You really want to know? United States
Member Since: Jul 2010
Member Points: 632

The only time I played this opening was when I moved my pawn up and hit submit before I saw that I had moved it up only one spaces. It was a rather hard gmae but I did win it! :)

by ujwalchesswizard - 11 months ago
california India
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 48

what's up with this opening?????????

by StupidDrip95 - 11 months ago
NJ United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 1504

Queens gambit, not this. this is not ambitious enough

by metallictaste - 13 months ago
Nunya United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 145

To me, at least, this opening is best countered if you are black by a queenside fianchetto, as well as sometime playing e6 to get your dark bishop out to attack the enemy knight- its okay, you can get rid of it, in fact, its better if you do because enemy pawns want to control the dark squares.

by mwzhou - 13 months ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 81

interesting openning!!

by 1plus1is4 - 15 months ago
New York United States
Member Since: Jul 2010
Member Points: 1631

bad , BAD

by vowles_23 - 17 months ago
Perth Australia
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 2652

I like it. And @ DarkMorphon, it is not the French as that is when Black plays 1... e6 in response to 1.e4.

by devilboy666 - 18 months ago
oneonta United States
Member Since: Jul 2010
Member Points: 1

actually thiz iz a good black opening move

by as2100 - 19 months ago
bushehr Iran
Member Since: Jun 2010
Member Points: 22

anyone?

by RothKevin - 22 months ago
Florida United States
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 89

Ruy lopez is the way to go....not this

by CmanBst - 22 months ago
Georgia United States
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 168

I'm not a very good chess player but wouldn't it make more sense to move the pawn up to spaces so as not to block the dark square bishop?

by LeonardFlaro - 2 years ago
Somewhere Canada
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 2

People who discount this opening as terrible should really study the mid and end game possibilities.  Yes, at first it may seem passive yet during mid game it not only allows for a good defense against bishop pins it gives push to regain (if lost) the ever so important center.

Also opening the Queen and White Bishop early can give you a good feel for blacks intentions.

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.