13376 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Actually, Stockfish 64bit suggests white has a slight (very slight) advantage if whites next move is Nf3. At depth 30 it calculated a pretty nice rook+knight pawn endgame, still favoring white though at about +=(0.30). This should be a good opening because we don't play perfect moves every game, and this opening looks very punish for both sides if they neglect their position.
SO BAD OPENING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bien c'est vraiment tres bien
The official should be protected, that is what we are playing.
This looks bad for White.
Kasporov played black against deep blue with this opening
Intereseted in the Anti-Sicilian, Alapin variation of the Sicilian?
Join the Anti-Sicilian Group
bB5, bD7, c4 OR bB5, nD7, c4. What do you think about a double threat? If he take bishop then pawn takes queen... If you take bishop after a threat to bishop then he is forced to pull the queen back unless he wants to risk moving his king. But if he blocks then I threat the queen with the pawn and he takes g2 then im screwed
Bb5 or d4 would get black in some trouble.
I don't trust too much the IQP. In an ending it is simply weak and as black I usually wait until white has played Nbd2 or Na3 to take on d4
The black end up winning because they get to have a valuable piece on the centre which controls man places. It is also good because it will take a lot of moves to take it of there.
after d4 black will eventually have to exchange on d4 leaving white with a potentially dangerous IQP and a free c3 square for his knight
e5 seems like a bad version of the french as the bishop will go out of the pawn chain I'd probably play Nc6 Bf5(g4) and e6 and black can fight for something more than equality
I presume that you mean 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5 3.e5
The move is playable, and it leads to positions that might resemble the advance variation of the Caro-Kann.
There are only about 35 games in the chess.com database with 3.e5 and few if any where both players were 2400+. This doesn't necessarily mean the move is bad, however it does mean that 3.e5 isn't very fashionable.
why can't you advance the E pawn instead of taking D5?
but the knight is blocked
from one side
it dosen't look like a good opening
after c4 white must be much worse.
d4 is simply too weak after Qd6 and e5 followed by Nc6 Nge7 trying Nf5 and Nd4.if black can stop any attemp of white to get activity black should be better.
White can move his c-Pawn with 4.c4 however that gets back to my earlier remarks. It wastes an important tempo. Not only that, the vital d4 square is now weakened and could well be a liability.
I'd say the move is playable, but it's no advantage at all, and might leave White a little worse.
Here's an example: 4.c4 Qe4+ 5.Qe2 Qxe2+ 6.Bxe2 Nc6 and White has to be thinking about how to equalize.
15,781 Games in Database
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!