Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 6 weeks ago

    DavidGundisch

    @1828rule, @chesed1973. A bind is usually and advantage in space created by advanced pawns. The Maroczy bind

     is a well know example of this.

  • 7 weeks ago

    1828rule

    good video, but yes, what is a bind?

  • 7 weeks ago

    chesed1973

    What does he mean by "make a bind"?

  • 2 months ago

    Makragic

    Little unclear video.

  • 3 months ago

    jaycdp

    Any body know the isreali fellow i forgot his name

  • 4 months ago

    jayarjo

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 5 months ago

    DontDrinkRedBull

    You should do some more videos. I think your lectures are very easy to understand. It's really really good.

  • 5 months ago

    eddy4zheng

    Thank you so much!

  • 6 months ago

    dccyclist001

    I love the comment: "Don't just sit there and wait for them to catch up, get out there and kill them!" :)

  • 11 months ago

    cdowis75

    I guess somebody hit me with a stupid stick.  

    Anyway, with more experience I discovered that counting is essential to dynamic play, as important as any positional understanding.

  • 11 months ago

    EmptyBelt

    Very interesting video. I have been trying t understand, tempo and how to decide who has more of it in my chess games. You have successfully made that clear to me. Thank you and good day.

  • 12 months ago

    EasonZhao

    Stupid

  • 15 months ago

    cdowis75

    While Development is very important, I fail to see much practical value in "counting".  As you say, it depends on alot of factors.  "Space and control" over the board is, for me, more practical in my games.

  • 17 months ago

    TexanCanadian

    Haha, "the rooks will never see each other because one has...died"

  • 17 months ago

    AbiodunBalogun

    Excellent piece!!

  • 18 months ago

    john-warner

    Great first video to this series!Thanks

  • 20 months ago

    djinnm

    Nice and helpful tip! This is my first time! Thank you for the free diamond membership! ;)

  • 20 months ago

    AtomicJoshh

    @zoom_4T That's an incredibly subjective and ridiculous standard. First, how could you objectively judge how "agreeable" a person's voice is? The answer is you can't; it's going to be different for every person. Second, if the teacher is understandable and informative, why is the sound of their voice relevant in any way to the lesson? The value in this video is that the instructor is an international master; not that they have an "agreeable" (whatever that means) voice.

  • 23 months ago

    zoom_4T

    for didactical purposes, it is important for a video that the "teacher" has an agreable voice, this is not the case hera, although the competence of this teacher is great! So i can refer to Kevin (in thechesswebsite.com) or the videos of kingscrusher (you find on youtube). these voices are much more pleasant to ear, find them and appreciate the difference! I therefore suggest that chess.com find such a teacher.

  • 2 years ago

    AdamRhetoric

    [COMMENT DELETED]
Back to Top

Post your reply: