Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 10 months ago

    IM ACEChess

    My deepest, humblest apologies Tongue Out...

  • 10 months ago

    DimebagDerek

    Also the 1. b3 Nimzo-Larsen attack group is a fantastic group.  Wormrose and Linksspringer have very well organized data on how to handle the opening and how it has evolved.  It might not be the 'strongest' opening move, but these guys handle it like pros and we have great games.

  • 10 months ago

    Stanley3349223

    Danny, I am sooooooo offended by you insulting the 1.b3 systems. I happen to be a b3 player myself and I'll have it known that GM BENT LARSEN plays it too. If you insult the b3 systems, you'll have to deal with Bent Larsen. Yell

  • 12 months ago

    IM ACEChess

    "Cackle" is simply a word I use to replace "castle"... Why? Because I can Tongue out!!!

  • 12 months ago

    devotin

    what's a cackle long ? at 5:56

  • 12 months ago

    Abhishek2

    It's called the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Opening.

  • 14 months ago

    Huitzilopochtli

    Is there a reason (after the 5. f4 variation) that you can't play 6...Bg4 pinning the knight on f3 and securing e5? Looks like black would be alright there, but I'm sure I could be missing something.

  • 14 months ago

    Rook98

    cool vid

  • 15 months ago

    ChenGJ

    nice

  • 15 months ago

    Bubatz

    As was already noted, White missed out on the strongest move 5.f4, and after 5...Qe7, he also missed 6.c4! In Jacob's and Tait's "Nimzo-Larsen Attack", 6.d4?! is given the mark of dubiosity because after 6...e4 7.Ne5 Black has 7...Qg5! which Danny missed - though it's interesting to see in the video how he felt there must be something better here than giving up the bishop pair.

  • 15 months ago

    jaytonbye

    Hillarious, instructive, and entertaining! Thanks

  • 15 months ago

    Gm_andrewfeng

    Related to

  • 15 months ago

    wormrose

    @rupnaylak 

    After 4.f4 in your line Black has 4...exf4 and then 5.exf4 Qd7+ and White has problems.

  • 15 months ago

    rupnaylak

    Similar to the line you guys looked at, but a different punchline...
    EDIT: The guy played bd6 first. good point!
  • 15 months ago

    Templetonkaka

    thanks

  • 15 months ago

    timlawson

    That's cool - I wasn't having a pop at your analysis as I coach juniors and a few adults myself so my comments were just to reassure but yes, you derfinitely raised some good points!

  • 15 months ago

    wormrose

    @timlawson - I am only a ~1700 player myself. I was not challenging IM Rensch's analysis so much as speaking in defense of the Nimzo-Larsen Attack which is my favorite opening. What I have submitted are lines from my books on the NLA and of course there is more.

    I felt the line 5.Nf3 did not serve as a good example of the potential of the opening and IM Rensch's analysis has demonstrated that.

    My intent was to stimulate some interest. Wink Thanks.

  • 15 months ago

    timlawson

    Hi wormrose - Sorry, my analysis was just down the line that Danny mentioned during the video. Of course, you are correct that you wouldn't expect anyone to play a "??" move so you make a very good point of course.

    However, looking at this again, black doesn't have to capture the c6 bishop right away because the g2 bishop is also hanging therefore I would give your suggestion of 10.... bxc6 a "??" as well! To even things up, black can STILL play 10.....Kd8! and that leaves both of white's bishops en-prise. Now things start to get a bit more complicated (beyond my meagre skills) so we might need Danny to step in and offer some analysis (or maybe, Danny, produce one of your excellent vids on a couple of these hyper modern openings - any Danny vid is a great vid in my opinion!!)

    For what it's worth and bear in mind I'm not an IM/GM etc....

    If b2xe5 then after Qxe5 the rook on a1 hangs so that must be defended, probably with Nc3 and then the bishop on c6 can be captured. I should have included this as a sideline in the analysis - apologies but I was so excited at having actually found a good move for a change, I went ahead of myself!

    Update:-

    I've now put this position through fritz (albeit briefly) and it does turn the position into a bit of a mess but fritz actually prefers black. Here's the update - because I didn't consider that after 9 Bxc6 - Kd8 that white can play 10. d4! and this saves the position for white but fritz does still like black's position.

    I have amended the game here with some more analysis (some of it mine and admittedly some of it in collaboration with fritz).

    It's not a case of "ner ner ner ner ner" or "I told you I was right" because you pointed out the best response for white. The analysis after 10. Kd8 in this next game is most likely flawed in some way as it's been cobbled together fairly quickly but it does look to me like black is slightly better in all of the "sensible" lines (i.e. where neither side is playing "??" moves!)

    What do you think guys?

     

  • 15 months ago

    abhy0024

    kind of like the fishingpile trap

  • 15 months ago

    dynasty3456

    On 16:00 why not Qh6
Back to Top

Post your reply: