Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 3 months ago

    GMPsych

    I like the videos!Smile

  • 4 months ago

    SeunBaraka

    Nice one IM

  • 5 months ago

    viswamitra

    I get it! Slow in the chase does not win the race in chess...the dragon sets that up right away by creating a positional weakness and anchor for the Yugoslav to chase.

  • 7 months ago

    kgb100p

    wow i enjoyed it very much so. cause im a dragon player, i played it cause i had a book once .victor korshnoi ,that i lost .and thats how i fell in love with chess,not knowing openings ,a friend introduced me to a chess club,then my eyes opened thank you for your knowledge sir.

  • 7 months ago

    saarland

    Hello together,

     

    I think that the speech of the explanations have been to quick.

     

    In my opinion it would be ana advantage to invest more time regarding the different positions. Not so progressive players need more time to follow the different ideas.

     

    Thank you. 

  • 8 months ago

    tetradon

    Excellent video.  Have played the dragon recently, making many of the mistakes you are talking about.  I think I'll just abandon it!

  • 8 months ago

    IM pfren

    @ tschuegechess:

    This is theory, not a stupid idea.

    The sac is interesting, but close to unsound.

    Theoretically, after 9...Bxg4 10.fg4 Nxg4 is 11.Bg1, but few players play that (although it's the engine's preferred choice). The reason is that Black has quite a few tactical shots handy.

    Less ambitious, but more solid and apparently enough for some advantage is 11.Nb3(!) when Black has tried some ideas (mainy based on the ...d5 break), but it seems that in all variations he is shrt of equality.



  • 8 months ago

    tschuegechess

    Hmm.. Maybe this is a very stupid idea. But at 13:41, how bad would it be for black if he sacrifised his light square bishop by taking on g4 and later take the other pawn with the knight. Sure black's down a point. But white  doesn't have many ways to attack on the blacks kingside (or does it? ^^) and  after that black can completly concentrate on its own attack.

  • 8 months ago

    Wzntz

    Knowledge, you are good at passing it on. Thanks.

  • 8 months ago

    Rebel_Rebecca

    im too under rated to do this.

  • 8 months ago

    ienj0ychess

    Hey Danny - I didn't think you were tongue tied at all. You were articulate and effectively communicated your ideas, which promoted an increased ease of understanding, as usual. Thanks for the instructive analysis!

  • 8 months ago

    jtschess

    We like it, yeah! 

    I am having trouble dealing with Philidor defence - could you cover that in a future video?

  • 8 months ago

    youngwine

    I play chess just for fun and don't know opennings, i'm beginning to appreciate lessons like video explanations by all in chess.com.

  • 8 months ago

    ckonjeti

    Why is g4 a good move at 10:52 I think

  • 8 months ago

    spassky

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 8 months ago

    dzindzifan

    very well done

  • 8 months ago

    nicschne

    What about g5 instead of b5 at 32:00

  • 8 months ago

    weeverrm

    Very good and helpful. Love the member analysis and live sessions.

    .. ditto regarding apologizing.. humor, rabling etc. it always comes out in the end.

    Keep it up

  • 8 months ago

    pumpupthevolume247

    Now I know why I never play the Dragon! This is one opening/defence that I'm not gonna chase Laughing - I'll stick with hunting down the Najdorf and Scheveningen for now.

    That crazy rook sac line is, well crazy! I'm gonna set up and play the position against Houdini from both sides and try and gauge the way to play it properly, the position is just too crazy for me to not try out!!

    Interesting lesson overall, your knowledge and passion for the Yugoslav attack shines through, great stuff Danny! Cool

  • 8 months ago

    Czechman

    Wow... Great stuff! Now I'm brain-tied Surprised

Back to Top

Post your reply: