Computer Free Analysis #2

Computer Free Analysis #2

Avatar of Armand_Spenser
| 12

Hi all,

As stated in this post last week, my new chess resolution is to do a double analysis, at least once a week. That is, first going through the game as slowly as possible without any computer. I want to take notes, make guesses of when the blunders are, what the eval is in key position etc., and only after all this, go through the official chess.com analysis.

I then post both analyses on my blog without hiding my dumb original comments. So you can enjoy the blunders I made in the game and blunders I made in analysis!

The idea is the same idea behind the whole blog. To give some motivations, ideas, and learning tricks to people who, like me, wish to improve their rapid online rating.

But before going to the game, let me give the usual warning: I am no chess master. Just a guy who likes to work on his chess and still remembers what being a beginner feels like. So my advice is definitively not as smart as those from GMs, but it may be a bit well suited to new players.

Now without further ado, let's go to the game!


The game

Here is my game with my computer-free analysis:

And here is the analysis with the computer.


Takeaways

1) Comparing my analysis to the first one, I think I have already made some progress.
I am pretty happy that I caught my first opening blunder with 11... Bb4, and also saw why my opponent didn't punish it properly with 12 a3.
I am also happy with my correct analysis of 12... Qb6 being the best move. 
As with the first exercise, I am confident this will help me remember these opening ideas for future games.

2) I still missed quite a bit of tactic, both in the game and the analysis. But the position was sharp, and the tactics were non-trivial. So I don't feel too bad.

3) I hope I'll remember the mistake that was 13... Qxe5. I will add to my extensive list of chess rules of thumb the following half-baked wisdom: "always look for simplification when you are materially up, but development down. Especially if the alternative is to grab even more material".

All in all, it was a very productive second installment of this double analysis, at least for me.

As before, I hope you found it instructive too, and even more, I hope it will inspire you to try the double analysis yourself!

Until next time, happy learning!

Hi all,

I am no chess master. Simply a guy with a normal busy life who started late. I don't know how to play perfect chess, but I know how to improve and wish to share what helped me move from 1000 to 2150 on chess.com in roughly four years. Nine times out of ten, you should listen to a GM instead of me, but I have one and only strength over that of a master: I remember what it's like to be a complete beginner.

I enjoy playing rapid games, anything between 30-0 and 10-0. My advice will be directed towards people who enjoy the same time controls, but any non-master wishing to improve will find something in my posts.

I hope you find some useful stuff in my writing to keep improving while having fun!