Week 5 Review: Boston Blitz vs. Baltimore Kingfishers

Week 5 Review: Boston Blitz vs. Baltimore Kingfishers

Sep 26, 2013, 9:56 PM |

Boston Blitz vs. Baltimore Kingfishers 2-2
IM Marc Esserman (2569) - IM Levan Bregadze (2469) 0.5-0.5 View Game
SM Denys Shmelov (2465) - IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat (2492) 0.5-0.5 View Game
NM Vadim Martirosov (2349) - GM Larry Kaufman (2401) 0.5-0.5 View Game
NM Ilya Krasik (2286) - NM Andrew Zheng (2159) 0.5-0.5 View Game

Note: Players in italic have the white pieces.


The Baltimore Kingfishers ended the match against the Boston Blitz in a deadlocked tied match.  All four games ended in draws, but that doesn't mean there weren't ups and downs along the way!  The other Northeast Division match between New England and Connecticut was also drawn, so the relative standings have not changed in the Northeast Division.  Baltimore remains 2 match points behind the Connecticut Dreadnoughts for the 2nd divisional playoff spot.  Baltimore will play the Philadelphia Inventors next Tuesday.


Board 1: IM Marc Esserman vs. IM Levan Bregadze. The top board featured a Classical Pirc Defense.  IM Esserman started the game with 22 minutes less than IM Bregadze due to lateness.  They actually followed a game played in the Austrian Staatsliga (State League) in 1995 that ended as a draw in the position after black's 16th move.  However, our two USCL players played out the following rook, bishop, and pawns ending where only white had winning chances with an extra pawn.  After 42 moves, the players agreed to a draw as black had neutralized white's pawn advantage.  IM Bregadze seemed comfortable throughout the game as he ended with over 60 minutes on the clock to IM Esserman's 5 minutes and change.



Board 2: IM Tegshsuren Enkhbat vs. SM Denys Shmelov. The second board began with a Slav Defense.  IM Enkhbat played the novelty 12. h3.  This was the last game of the match (also the night) to finish as IM Enkhbat kept pressing to try to come up with a victory.  However, SM Shmelov was able to defend well and the two agreed to a draw in a rook and 2 pawns ending.



Board 3: NM Vadim Martirosov vs. GM Larry Kaufman. The third board started as a Catalan but quickly transposed into a Bogo-Indian Defense.  NM Martirosov played the novelty with 11. cxd5.  NM Martirosov missed a chance to win with 30. b4 which simply wins black's knight.  Instead, the move he played allowed the position to stay equal and the game soon ended in an agreed draw when it was clear the game would liquidate into an opposite-color bishop ending with an equal amount of pawns.



Board 4: NM Andrew Zheng vs. NM Ilya Krasik. The fourth board showcased an Hyper-Accelerated Dragon Sicilian.  NM Zheng actually played 2 novelties: 10. 0-0 and 11. Qe1.  The move 10. exd5 has been played at least 9 times before, but with less than stellar results for white (+1 =2 -6) but the move 11. exd5 has had good results for white (+2 =2) previously.  Later on, white went down an exchange and it looked like just a matter of time before NM Krasik won.  However, NM Zheng kept playing and eventually won back the exchange on move 40.  The players found themselves in a same-colored bishop ending with black having an extra pawn.  In fact, NM Zheng even gave up another pawn with 45. h4 to disconnect black's kingside pawns.  White eventually was allowed to take both h-pawns and the game was agreed drawn with equal material on the board.



Check out all the US Chess League action at: http://www.uschessleague.com/

For archived blog posts, see: http://baltimorekingfishers.blogspot.com/