I Played a 2800 GM Four Times and Here's What I Learned
Recently, while playing unrated 1|0 bullet on Chess.com, I had the incredible honor of matching up against GM Renier Gonzalez. We ended up playing four games, and I was struck not only by his immense skill but also by his respectfulness throughout our matches. Here’s my breakdown of the experience. Links to the games are at the end!
Game 1 (White Pieces)
I opened with 1.e4, and he responded with a King’s Indian Defense setup. For the first 18 moves, I held a very slight advantage and felt like I was playing quite well. However, once we transitioned into the middlegame, it quickly became clear who the grandmaster was and who the 2200 was. I made a few positional mistakes that allowed him to create a passed pawn and win a second pawn shortly after.
Meanwhile, he steadily built up a time advantage, keeping about 5–7 more seconds than me. Even as I tried to generate kingside counterplay, he defended flawlessly and eventually pinned my queen to my king with a rook. With just six seconds left against his fifteen and no way to recover, I resigned.
Game 2 (Black Pieces)
Immediately after, we played again. This time, I had the black pieces, and he opted for a King’s Indian Attack, fianchettoing his bishop to g2. Again, the opening went reasonably well — I stayed equal and even had a slight edge (-0.4) around move 12. But as the middlegame heated up, he increased the pressure.
He captured my bishop on g6 with his knight, doubling my pawns and weakening my king’s position. Although material stayed equal for a while, his pieces became much more active. He soon played a brilliant move — sacrificing his bishop to destroy a key defender of my knight. After I recaptured, he won my knight cleanly. From there, it was textbook — he picked up another pawn, traded pieces efficiently, and converted the winning endgame with a strong time edge. I resigned soon after.
Game 3 (White Pieces)
In the third game, nerves got to me. Once again facing his King’s Indian Defense, I blundered a pawn on d4 early. He picked up another pawn soon after, and though I tried to create a kingside attack, he calmly neutralized it. A simple fork of my king and queen forced a queen trade, leading to a rook and opposite-colored bishop endgame.
From there, he methodically marched his king and pawns up the board, traded rooks, promoted a pawn, and checkmated me — absolutely textbook. Like the first two games, once he got even a small advantage, he simply squeezed it without giving me a chance to create counterplay.
Game 4 (Black Pieces)
In our final game, I again faced his King’s Indian Attack setup. Early on, I struggled with time management — falling behind by about 5 seconds by move 10, which would only get worse later. Around move 12, he captured one of my central pawns and began building up pressure.
I sacrificed another pawn to double his a-pawns, trying to stir up counterplay with my knight and rooks. But he remained calm, trading rooks and creating a clear plan to promote his passed a-pawn, supported by his dark-squared bishop. Meanwhile, his time advantage grew to 10–15 seconds. With no way to stop the pawn’s promotion, I had to resign.
Reflections (and what you can learn)
Playing GM Renier Gonzalez was an unforgettable learning experience. One thing that really stood out was how he maintained small advantages, both on the board and on the clock, throughout every game. Even when positions seemed objectively close, he kept applying pressure, forced small concessions, and never made any major mistakes. Against a player of that caliber, once you fall behind — whether by a pawn or even just a few seconds — it becomes nearly impossible to recover.
Looking back, I think I could have tried mixing up the openings more, maybe steering the games into sharper lines to create more practical chances or to at the very least force him to spend more time. However, that is easier said than done, especially when he played flexible King's Indian setups that can handle almost anything.
I also realized just how essential time management is in bullet. It is not just about staying even on the clock, but about constantly creating small time advantages and keeping the pressure on your opponent. In bullet, time is just as important as the position on the board. Even if you are slightly better, if you fall behind on the clock, it can all slip away. Playing a little faster and more confidently in the opening could have kept the clock situation more balanced, giving me better chances later in the game. Every second matters, and managing your time well can often be the difference between winning and losing, even in equal or worse positions.
Most importantly, I learned something about mindset: when you face someone stronger, you cannot play just to survive. You have to treat them like any other player. Challenge them, create problems, stay practical, and do not give them too much respect over the board. Even against world-class players, the goal is the same — to put up resistance, stay sharp, and keep fighting!
Overall, it was a huge honor to play GM Renier Gonzalez, and I came away with valuable lessons that I hope to apply in my future games. If you ever get the chance to play someone much stronger than you, embrace it and just play your game!
If you liked this blog and want more like it, consider following so you don’t miss any new blogs!
