Is game review becoming less useful to learn?

Game review is a popular feature here. Is it becoming bad in quality? If yes, then that should mean a change in the algorithm probably to cater to a different range more, or simply to give out more  'brilliant moves', 'great moves' and 'mistakes'. Am I only one feeling that game review is outputting more of these recently? 

I understand that game review is calling a move brilliant, great, ..., mistake, blunder depending on the rating of the players also, and that's very good. Nevertheless, I feel that game review is tending to give out more great moves and mistakes now than it used to do earlier.

As an example, look it this game (review) where both players are rated 1950+, and yet the move 29...Nxe1 is marked as a great move. I don't see anything great about that move. A move before that (28.Bxe3) is rightfully marked as a blunder because it allows or rather invites a fork, and 9...Nxe1 is the obvious follow-up to that fork (not following up with 29...Nxe1 would be a mistake, not even a miss in my opinion). Probably, game review is marking it as a great move instead of a best move because it is the only (good) move. But, this is not a good choice because (i) there is no surprise element in that move (which an engine cannot measure most of the time, to be fair), and (ii) the move that made it possible is already marked as a blunder.