x
Chess - Play & Learn

Chess.com

FREE - In Google Play

FREE - in Win Phone Store

VIEW
The Threat is stronger than the execution.

The Threat is stronger than the execution.

Daybreak57
Apr 11, 2017, 11:40 PM 0

"The threat is stronger than the execution"-Aron Nimzowitsch

Imagine playing a game and everything is going fine, and then your opponent makes a move that doesn't necessarily win the game with just that move but starts a chain reaction that ends in a gain of material or mate?  I play a lot of games where my opponent will do a pin, and I will say, "Bah, everyone does that," and I sometimes dismiss a very powerful move as an easily solvable move, however, sometimes, there is something to the innocuous pin that you think achieves nothing.

 

 

Notice in the game I didn't bother to check my own candidate moves and opponent replies to them, I just picked the first move that came to my mind and made it without checking my answers.  Then later, I got into a predicament where I could have saved the immediate loss of material by moving my king to f1, breaking the pin, but I tried to hold onto a lost position without giving up the right to castle.  My first blunder was moving my knight to attack his queen.  I may have lost a pawn, but at least I wouldn't have lost a piece, had I of just castled, instead of attacking the queen with my knight.  Anyway, I think this game proves Nimzovitches point, that the threat is stronger than the execution.  I can't tell you how many games where I think a threat is a waste of time but end up losing the game because of it.  Checks captures and threats.  Don't underestimate any of them.  The second you do, is the second you lose.

Online Now