
β ’-What if: Sherlock Holmes was a chess player instead of a detective.
My greetings to my chess readers!
To start today's article, I will tell you that I am a true fan of Sherlock Holmes, when it comes to Arthur Conan Doyle, you are wrong to meet me. If you don't believe me, you can see a club that I am an admin of: William_James_Moriarty_II. π, Wait, I love Sherlock Holmes.
Haha, you can call me a genius or a prodigy because sometimes I think of silly questions, but I feel that they are not silly at all. At least I encourage myself that the question is not silly at all. Okay, let's get to the main topic: ''Have you ever wondered what it would be like if Sherlock Holmes was a chess player instead of a detective?'' If you have the same question as me, then you and I are on the same wavelength and you might be a genius. I have very few friends because I am a genius...

When chess replaces detective work.
I'm going to talk a little about Sherlock Holmes. And if you ask why, I don't have an answer, we should start from the so-called beginning, just like the saying: ''Every chess master was once a beginner.'' – Irving Chernev.
Sherlock Holmes: is a fictional detective created by British author Arthur Conan Doyle. Referring to himself as a "consulting detective" in his stories, Holmes is known for his almost magical powers of observation, deduction, forensic science, and logical reasoning, which he uses when investigating cases for various clients, including Scotland Yard. Although not the first fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes is arguably the most famous. By the 1990s, more than 25,000 stage, film, television, and print adaptations had featured the detective, and the Guinness World Records lists him as the most portrayed literary character in film and television history. Holmes's popularity and popularity is so great that many people believe he is not a fictional character but a real person.
Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows. This work features a chess game that is said to have been played by Sherlock Holmes against William Moriarty. You can see the content of the chess game.
Although there was no actual game of chess played between Holmes and Moriarty, the game was inspired by a real-life game between two chess players. In the game you can see Sherlock Holmes sacrificing his Queen to gain an advantage. After sacrificing his Queen, Moriarty says: ''I think you have just lost your most valuable piece.'' Holmes says: ''Sometimes sacrifice is necessary to win the game.'' And Holmes is right.
I think if Holmes were a real chess player, perhaps chess would have had a top player. That is why the author of the famous detective work Arthur Conan Doyle did not spend much time on Detective Sherlock. Yes, although Sherlock Holmes created a fever right from its debut, Considered the leading novelist in the field of detective stories, Arthur Conan Doyle's name is closely associated with the character he created - detective Sherlock Holmes. But in reality, things are not as we readers think...
Doyle began Holmes' adventures in the form of long novels, starting with "A Study in Scarlet" written in 1887. However, he did not pay much attention to the genre of his stories. He wanted to write about history and considered it much more important than detective novels. Therefore, I think Sherlock Holmes should be a professional chess player rather than a talented detective.
As Arthur Conan Doyle said.
It would be remiss of me to omit a character named William Moriarty. In the novel, if Holmes is the light who always relies on his intelligence to bring crimes to light, then in the same city, Moriarty represents the darkness, who always uses the genius mind of a mathematics professor to commit crimes such as crime, corruption,...
''Excellence in Chess is a sign of a resourceful mind.''– Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. That is what Arthur Conan Doyle said, it has similarities with Sherlock Holmes, while in the novel Sherlock is a detective with a talent for reasoning and intelligence beyond others, in chess Holmes is the same.
Well if that were true then today the world would know the name of a chess player Moriarty, he is described as intelligent, a mathematician, that is quite similar to the quote of the author of the novel.
The story could have gone in another direction.
Yes, that's right, when we witness a professional chess player named Sherlock Holmes, whose appearance in a chess game made Doctor Watson, a chess player, fascinated by Holmes' intelligence and wanting to be friends with him.
If we go in that direction, Professor Moriarty is also a chess player on par with Holmes.
In the novel, there is a key detail which is the encounter between Holmes and Moriarty at the Reichenbach Falls, the two characters have the opportunity to face each other and compete directly. In the end, both fall into the waterfall and die. It would be absurd for me to compare Sherlock with Wilhelm Steinitz, the first world champion, and Moriarty with Emanuel Lasker because Moriarty and Lasker were both mathematics professors.

At the Reichenbach Falls, if instead of a war, there was a game of chess between two chess geniuses. Just like the second chess championship match between Emanuel Lasker and Wilhelm Steinitz.
My Conclusion
It's time to end today's article, first of all I thank you for reading. This article of mine is for reference and entertainment purposes only.
Then back to the issue of chess Sherlock Holmes, if that is true then perhaps chess has a famous chess player coming out of the novel, Holmes's adventures through chess games can be a revival for chess and chess will be more abundant.
Moriarty will be a chess player instead of a London crime professor, I like that scenario.
Sometimes just a few pictures make me think more.


Yes, I am a chess player and have a strong passion for Sherlock Holmes. I must affirm that after looking at these pictures, there was a sense of urgency in me to write this article.
It doesn't stop there. As Holmes once said: ''When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.'' Chess may seem impossible in Holmes's story, but it is still possible.



''I am passionate about chess, passionate about Holmes. When you take chess from me, I have Holmes left. When you take Holmes from me, I have chess left. And when you take both chess and Holmes, I have nothing left.'' -The saying of a foolish genius.-
Goodbye and see you again.
Note: I kept my promise, I realized I learned a lot from everyone and the club. Thank you for giving me advice and mistakes. This article I applied what I learned from everyone. Thanks.